Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lenovo pulled a stunt before where they loaded their "extra software" inside UEFI to be installed by Windows after a fresh install.
That caused so much of a backlash that they released a new BIOS version without that stuff. As was absolutely fair. Abusing Windows' ability to obtain HW-drivers though UEFI (something which can be used for good) to bundle shit-ware is just absolutely rotten.
Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
51–60 of 323 posts
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#52OEM: Let's differentiate our otherwise commodity hw product! OEM: I know, let's add value with bundled software the customer can't uninstall! Then the bundled software turns out to (inevitably) be useless vulnerable garbage. Inevitably because a) the customer doesn't need it, b) it's engineered with all the effort that normally goes into adware for captive audiences (i.e., _minimal_), which means it will be vulnerabl…
OEM: Profit
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#53Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
That’s astounding. Suddenly my “zero the entire storage, including partition table” methodology which I always somewhat regarded as overkill appears to be reasonable and/or necessary.
Such are the problems Purism is said to be attacking: https://puri.sm/products/librem-13/
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#55Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#56OEM: Let's differentiate our otherwise commodity hw product! OEM: I know, let's add value with bundled software the customer can't uninstall! Then the bundled software turns out to (inevitably) be useless vulnerable garbage. Inevitably because a) the customer doesn't need it, b) it's engineered with all the effort that normally goes into adware for captive audiences (i.e., _minimal_), which means it will be vulnerabl…
You forgot the last part: OEM: Profit
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#57This is exactly why you should remove any bundled software from vendors and try to start afresh when picking up a new machine.
Lenovo pulled a stunt before where they loaded their "extra software" inside UEFI to be installed by Windows after a fresh install.
Holy cow. Would you have a link on this?
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#58General sanity aside, the whole exploit hinges on the fact that they used string parsing to check for the prefix "http". This wouldn't have been exploitable if they used a proper URL library.
Do you think that a proper Url library would have protected against a MITM’d DNS attack?
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#59This is exactly why you should remove any bundled software from vendors and try to start afresh when picking up a new machine.
Lenovo pulled a stunt before where they loaded their "extra software" inside UEFI to be installed by Windows after a fresh install.
Re: Remote Code Execution on Most Dell Computers
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
Lenovo pulled a stunt before where they loaded their "extra software" inside UEFI to be installed by Windows after a fresh install.
> Lenovo pulled a stunt before where they loaded their "extra software" inside UEFI to be installed by Windows after a fresh install. Holy cow. Would you have a link on this?
Here's a random article covering it https://www.howtogeek.com/226308/the-windows-platform-binary...
You can find others by searching for "lenovo wpbt" or "lenovo unremovable crapware".