Earlier quoted context omitted.
Some differences between 1972 and 2019 include the U.S. no longer has a military presence in Taiwan, and the PRC has engaged in a vast modernization of the PLA, including its air force and navy ( https://thediplomat.com/2018/09/less-visible-aspects-of-chin... ). Is it enough to carry out a successful amphibious assault on and occupation of Taiwan? Maybe not (see https://www.ft.com/content/44586804-195c-11e9-9e64-d150…
Taiwan is - small, dense, and urban, which means that everything of value is close together, and urban warfare is extremely difficult and costly. - forested and mountainous, which would present problems with guerillas after a main invasion is over - across a sea, so they will probably lose people just trying to get to Taiwan in the first place If China were to militarily invade Taiwan they would probably bleed quite…
At the very most, king of at least 2 generations of extremely politically active, very pissed off people.
These are the people that took over their government buildings back in 2014 because of a suggested trade deal with China. As the young people did so, local businesses donated food, water, blankets, pillows etc in droves, demonstrated a cross-generational political activism that would be an absolute fucking nightmare to deal with as a brute-force conqueror.
Oops, the water lines to your PRC bases all clogged at the same time, weird!
Oops suddenly the internet doesn't work for PRC government offices, huh, strange!