Live data from Hacker News

Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

blog.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 89 posts

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#51

There are several comments here about Khosla and his efforts to convert public right of way to private property on the California Coast. It's fair to ask, "why is this relevant to a video of his views on the future (tech)?" It's relevant because the beach controversy shows that the future that Kohsla wants to create is inimicable to the future that I want to see. He sees a big-L libertarian future, where the strong e…

I'm weary of getting into this, but I don't think that's the right conclusion from the beach issue. I'm not intimately familiar but if you care about it, I'd recommend reading what he wrote about it. https://medium.com/@vkhosla/martins-beach-a-matter-of-princi... (I work at Khosla Ventures and have raised money from Khosla in the past)

Here's a more recent status update from the other side of this dispute: https://www.surfrider.org/coastal-blog/entry/whats-next-for-...

The Supreme Court refused to take up Khosla's most recent appeal, leaving in place the requirement that he leave the gate open to the access road to Martin's Beach.

It will be interesting to see what Khosla does now, given that he has exhausted his appeals in the court system.

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#52

There are several comments here about Khosla and his efforts to convert public right of way to private property on the California Coast. It's fair to ask, "why is this relevant to a video of his views on the future (tech)?" It's relevant because the beach controversy shows that the future that Kohsla wants to create is inimicable to the future that I want to see. He sees a big-L libertarian future, where the strong e…

X's viewpoint on Y needn't have any logical correlation/causation on X's viewpoint on Z, assuming Y & Z are orthogonal and independent. It is fair to criticize Khosla on beach access, but his investment record is self explanatory for his opinions on tech to be worthy of an audience. If you believe otherwise, you may also believe boycotting [YC, HN] to be valid and fair, for giving Khosla a platform, and accepting fun…

[deleted]

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#53
post #43

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, allocation of resources is pretty much _the_ issue right know in terms of the future. There is certainly a lot of opportunity to capture wealth for yourself, to mistreat the environment and in other ways "win". But in the end it is those who can afford to leave things on the table that are going to really win. The companies that can deliver more value to their employees, the cities can provide more affordable ho…

You can make the argument against private ownership of certain types of land for the purposes of public benefit, but I don't see the environmental point in this case. Privately owned areas, particularly beaches, usually fare better environmentally than high-traffic public access beaches. In the Philippines and Hawaii, beaches that are restricted due to indigenous sovereignty or private ownership don't have the litter…

I'm not arguing specifically about his actions, but about his actions in relation to the future. Like in any societal shift there are opportunities for the people who come out on top to leverage their position for themselves. Whether that is blocking public beaches or cheating the environment (like e.g. Volkswagen did).

But in the end you are cheating not only everyone else but also yourself. Volkswagen by falling behind in the shift to electric and Khosla in making his own community less viable. At the same time there are companies and communities out there, like Tesla (at lest for their customers), trying to do their best to provide as much value as possible.

While I get your point about tragedy of the commons I would still put that in the same category. I isn't like billionaires are the sole source of dysfunction in the world. It is a larger issue about giving up your own position for the benefit of more people so you all have something to build on. Certainly dysfunctional government, whether corrupt or democratically so, is part of that as well.

This is especially important with increasing complexity, and increased leverage in complexity. You can't really predict what specifically is going to make the difference.

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#54
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think blaming the victim is cruel in the case where the victim is powerless to defend themselves. But in the case where the victim simply failed to defend and fight for themselves I think it's important to criticize them.

In what way have the victims failed to fight for themselves? The beach access issue is kind of a thing all up and down the California coast.

My comment was specifically about the "don't blame the victim" thought-terminating-cliche. I'm not up to speed on the specifics of California coast access.

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#55

There are several comments here about Khosla and his efforts to convert public right of way to private property on the California Coast. It's fair to ask, "why is this relevant to a video of his views on the future (tech)?" It's relevant because the beach controversy shows that the future that Kohsla wants to create is inimicable to the future that I want to see. He sees a big-L libertarian future, where the strong e…

I'm weary of getting into this, but I don't think that's the right conclusion from the beach issue. I'm not intimately familiar but if you care about it, I'd recommend reading what he wrote about it. https://medium.com/@vkhosla/martins-beach-a-matter-of-princi... (I work at Khosla Ventures and have raised money from Khosla in the past)

I've read his post, and I think it's "not even wrong", in the sense that his conception of his rights is so fundamentally out of touch with reality, his premises so faulty, that attempting to engage with the arguments he bases on them is not worthwhile for either side.

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm weary of getting into this, but I don't think that's the right conclusion from the beach issue. I'm not intimately familiar but if you care about it, I'd recommend reading what he wrote about it. https://medium.com/@vkhosla/martins-beach-a-matter-of-princi... (I work at Khosla Ventures and have raised money from Khosla in the past)

Here's a more recent status update from the other side of this dispute: https://www.surfrider.org/coastal-blog/entry/whats-next-for-... The Supreme Court refused to take up Khosla's most recent appeal, leaving in place the requirement that he leave the gate open to the access road to Martin's Beach. It will be interesting to see what Khosla does now, given that he has exhausted his appeals in the court system.

He claims he'll litigate for the rest of his life. I suspect he'll keep finding new ways to refuse to comply, each time getting a type of citation that is different from the others based on the letter of the law (though not its spirit), and appeal each one as far as it'll go.

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#57

There are several comments here about Khosla and his efforts to convert public right of way to private property on the California Coast. It's fair to ask, "why is this relevant to a video of his views on the future (tech)?" It's relevant because the beach controversy shows that the future that Kohsla wants to create is inimicable to the future that I want to see. He sees a big-L libertarian future, where the strong e…

[deleted]

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's a more recent status update from the other side of this dispute: https://www.surfrider.org/coastal-blog/entry/whats-next-for-... The Supreme Court refused to take up Khosla's most recent appeal, leaving in place the requirement that he leave the gate open to the access road to Martin's Beach. It will be interesting to see what Khosla does now, given that he has exhausted his appeals in the court system.

He claims he'll litigate for the rest of his life. I suspect he'll keep finding new ways to refuse to comply, each time getting a type of citation that is different from the others based on the letter of the law (though not its spirit), and appeal each one as far as it'll go.

And my reply to Khosla, in the immortal words of Jeff Spicoli, “You Dick!”

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#59

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Strongly agreed. I don't even think I could work for a startup funded by Khosla Ventures.

Also strongly agreed.

I logged into my HN account for the first time in months just to upvote and add my agreement

Re: Vinod Khosla with Sam Altman on How to Build the Future [video]

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's a more recent status update from the other side of this dispute: https://www.surfrider.org/coastal-blog/entry/whats-next-for-... The Supreme Court refused to take up Khosla's most recent appeal, leaving in place the requirement that he leave the gate open to the access road to Martin's Beach. It will be interesting to see what Khosla does now, given that he has exhausted his appeals in the court system.

He claims he'll litigate for the rest of his life. I suspect he'll keep finding new ways to refuse to comply, each time getting a type of citation that is different from the others based on the letter of the law (though not its spirit), and appeal each one as far as it'll go.

Disgusting. It's too bad he'll get away with it. Normal people would go to jail after a while.
Post reply on HN