Live data from Hacker News

SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

bloomberg.com

51–60 of 322 posts

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#51
post #31

Another example of startup hubris. Much like Uber and AirBnB got started (and in many cases, continue to operate) by flouting regulations, Robinhood thinks they're being innovative, when they'll really just hoping they can get big enough that they can buy or bully their way past the rules. At least long enough to get acquired. It might work, but in this case, the people most likely to get screwed are the customers.

AirBnB and Uber are both examples of companies that were huge wins for customers/consumers. Just because they flout regulations which are often times outdated and unnecessary (re: protecting inefficient incumbents) doesn't mean they aren't doing what's good for the consumer. I agree though that Robinhood is a different story with potentially harmful consequences for unsophisticated investors looking for a safe/easy i…

The people sexually assaulted, discriminated against because of their skin color or sexuality, and those recorded in their beds without their consent would all presumably disagree that Uber and AirBnB flouting regulations made for huge wins for customers/consumers.

EDIT: The fact that these crimes "have happened at hotels/in taxis as well" ignores the fact that they are far more likely in an environment where regulations meant to prevent or reduce them are wholesale ignored.

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#52
The whole "this can't end well" seems to come at every Robin Hood product announcement.

The somewhat recent addition of crypto is just depressing. They've integrated it with chat and live announcements of transactions, so you see people's names as they buy $1500 or $2500 worth of crypto as the whole market makes an inverted hockey stick nosedive to zero.

But the most absurd thing was seeing the HN comments yesterday as people were saying they were living up to their name of taking from the rich and giving to the poor. They're doing something worse--tricking non-rich people into thinking they'll get rich, while making a ton of money in the process.

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#53

I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under th…

> bad idea about personal finance Such as?

Crypto, options, and margin investing for the unwary masses.

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#54

I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under th…

> every possible bad idea about ____ and put them in an app

this sounds like a lot of silicon valley darlings

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#55

Through all of this I can't help but be reminded of the 2008 financial crisis and think "this is not going to end well." One part of that crisis was Icelandic Banks making a huge push for savings all over the UK and other parts of Europe ("IceSave") with the promise of better interest rates. When it all went belly up those savers realized these Icelandic banks were not quite the same thing as UK banks and Iceland ref…

[deleted]

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

When you buy a bond and the interest rate goes up, the nominal value of the debt goes down when the interest rate goes up, while with bank accounts they stay the same. Ex: You buy a $100 bond at %3, then the prime rate goes up %1 so the typical market price of bonds of your class are now %4. Now your bond is worth less than $100 if you were to liquidate it. Big difference.

that's a good point. However, in this case, won't it be more like a bond-fund, where the fund essentially has a ladder of bonds that are constantly expiring and getting reinvested (and also investing new investments from retail investors), and so the overall value of the fund may still remain close to $100. I could well be wrong, so please feel free to correct me! Trying to learn.

Yes bond funds do that to even out interest rate changes kindof, but those fund prices can still go up and down in price as a result of interest rate changes and other market dynamics.

If they called this the 'bond fund account' with easy liquidation and buying to make it bank account-ish, then I don't think people would be as upset about this, but it would be a fairly niche financial product.

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> bad idea about personal finance Such as?

Crypto, options, and margin investing for the unwary masses.

impulse/app-driven day trading? selling spread as "free"?

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#58

I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under th…

> bad idea about personal finance Such as?

Idk why this was downvoted, but I would like to know as well. I feel like a know a decent amount about personal finance, and Robinhood is amazing. Primarily, I can trade stocks with zero fees. The app is easy to use. It's not outwardly pushing me to make bad decisions as far as I can tell. If there are issues on the business side, that's a separate concern(?)

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#59

I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under th…

> bad idea about personal finance Such as?

Single stock trading sold as an investment product to the low-end of the retail market (i.e. people like me who's limited investment dollars should be dumped into passive, diversified funds.)

Re: SIPC Says It Has Serious Concerns About Robinhood's New Product

#60

I don't understand the infatuation silicon valley has of Robinhood. Take almost every possible bad idea about personal finance and put them in an app, you get Robinhood. The business model is also suspect, I think there's a little more that hasn't been disclosed and I suspect the chase for cash started when the crypto currency fad started deflating in a hurry. I wonder if Robinhood is hiding something bigger under th…

> bad idea about personal finance Such as?

Good advice: Normal folks should put their money in index funds - not individual stocks and certainly not options.
Post reply on HN