They aren't laying off people, it was a voluntary separation: > Verizon Communications Inc said on Monday that about 10,400 employees will be leaving the U.S. wireless carrier by mid next year as part of the company’s voluntary separation program. They offered a package earlier in the year https://www.cnbc.com/2018/09/25/verizon-offers-separation-pl...
Of course they are. Many, many companies offer a “voluntary first” incentive to avoid the bad press and services they might otherwise have to provide to laid-off people. Jobs went away. Sugar-coating the exact method of ending the jobs doesn’t change that.
Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
51–60 of 215 posts
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#52That is 10,400 out of 152,300 per the article, or just a bit less than 7% of their workforce.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#53At least the described severance benefit might be on the correct order of magnitude to be considered reasonable and not totally and odiously evil, “As part of the separation program, the employees will get a salary of up to 60 weeks, bonus and benefits, depending on the length of their service, Verizon said.” This is why I always advise people to negotiate significance severance benefits up front, on the order of 6 m…
Also, which companies negotiate severance package before you are even hired? Especially as a new graduate? I've never heard of such thing as a software developer.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#54I'm so glad we passed those corporate tax cuts that created all those jobs and helped provide for all those raises everyone got....
There should be a box on our tax forms for "Adopt a Shareholder" so at the very least we can name the person we want to get our money. Talk about entitlements. These companies seem to think they're entitled to our money.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
They aren't laying off people, it was a voluntary separation It's just another layer of corporate double-speak. The same way "fired" became "laid off." Until the early 90's, "laid off" applied to factory and seasonal workers, who were expected to be recalled when production ramped up again.
I don't really think it's doublespeak. Laid off means an employer doesn't want/need your position anymore. Fired means an employer doesn't want you anymore.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#56Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#57I'm so glad we passed those corporate tax cuts that created all those jobs and helped provide for all those raises everyone got....
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#58At least the described severance benefit might be on the correct order of magnitude to be considered reasonable and not totally and odiously evil, “As part of the separation program, the employees will get a salary of up to 60 weeks, bonus and benefits, depending on the length of their service, Verizon said.” This is why I always advise people to negotiate significance severance benefits up front, on the order of 6 m…
New grads in partner-track roles at client service firms, MBA types, private equity, etc, maybe. 22-year old John Doe getting a job at ERAC with a 2.9 GPA from a state school? Absolutely not. Some places will certainly negotiate severance, but it's state and industry specific as well as very, very dependent on the position you're moving into.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#59> The New York-based company has been looking at cutting costs as it ramps up investment in its next generation 5G network, which is expected to fuel growth. "we're about to grow a ton, better cut 10k jobs to maximize those gains." that just sounds so... weird to me.
Re: Verizon says to shed 10,400 jobs by mid next year
#60I'm so glad we passed those corporate tax cuts that created all those jobs and helped provide for all those raises everyone got....
I don't know how many times Republicans have to try these to understand it doesn't work.