Earlier quoted context omitted.
We don’t have a legal way. FTFY
We have a technical method to do so, but the site has not been created, that I know of. For example: * A domain name like ipfs://nytimesmirror.com that mirrors nytimes articles (at the same relative URLs) * Some kind of crowdsourced process for content curation. I'm aware that it's not legal, but I wouldn't be against it. Content piracy has been a catalyst for change. I simultaneously would be willing to pay nytimes…
Yet paying for content has been a catalyst for...content.
> they might be incentivized to problem solve that for me.
What is that even supposed to mean?