Perhaps the citizens should object, I hear one of their congress critters is shitposting on twitter to that end. If the locals don't want their lives upended by gentrification, Berlin has shown a good example of how to block uninvited expansion by tech giants: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45971538
They elected the people that made that decision. If they don't like it, they can vote them out. Citing an example of some Berliner NIMBYs is not really helping your argument.
NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
51–60 of 359 posts
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#52Perhaps the citizens should object, I hear one of their congress critters is shitposting on twitter to that end. If the locals don't want their lives upended by gentrification, Berlin has shown a good example of how to block uninvited expansion by tech giants: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45971538
Isn't freedom great? Berlin can decide it doesn't want tech expansion, and New York can decide it does.
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#53This is such a great deal for NYC As the article says, they give up $1.5B over 10 years, but then get "Projected incremental tax revenue of more than $10 billion over 20 years." I dont know where that comes from but the payroll and property taxes paid by 25k employees dwarves the incentives. The most important part is it cements NYC as the main tech center on the East Coast. That is invaluable. EDIT: I wonder if NYC…
$1.5 billion in housing or just really anything to help people who already live there is what should happen.
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#54It implies only negative, doesn't it also has a lot of positive to it, like economic growth?
In particular, we don’t need to do this. If everyone said “no deal,” Amazon would be forced to behave as anyone else: consider each area based on its true merits, and make a decision accordingly.
In other words, the growth occurs regardless. No gifts needed.
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#55Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#56Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#57This is such a great deal for NYC As the article says, they give up $1.5B over 10 years, but then get "Projected incremental tax revenue of more than $10 billion over 20 years." I dont know where that comes from but the payroll and property taxes paid by 25k employees dwarves the incentives. The most important part is it cements NYC as the main tech center on the East Coast. That is invaluable. EDIT: I wonder if NYC…
That $10 billion likely assumes all new staff. There are going to be many current NYC citizens who simply switch jobs to Amazon. Therefore they won't contribute any incremental tax increase. Only if their previous employer rehires their position will a net new position be created.
How about for tech workers to get a raise? Or to move to a different part of the city? And besides, this is just conjecture. Do you have any data or polls or even anecdata which supports your claim?
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#58Perhaps the citizens should object, I hear one of their congress critters is shitposting on twitter to that end. If the locals don't want their lives upended by gentrification, Berlin has shown a good example of how to block uninvited expansion by tech giants: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45971538
They elected the people that made that decision. If they don't like it, they can vote them out. Citing an example of some Berliner NIMBYs is not really helping your argument.
It seems you didn't read my prior comment, some of their elected officials are opposed to Amazon moving in.
> Citing an example of some Berliner NIMBYs is not really helping your argument.
It shows how a community can fight back. Much of the change mega-corps bring to the neighborhoods and cities they set up shop in is not good, current locals definitely have a right to reject.
Re: NY state tax break is $48k per Amazon HQ job
#59Amazon could have chosen anywhere, somewhere where they could make a difference, create jobs, kick-start the economy. Serious bummer.
It turns out things are a bit more complicated than "a rising tide lifts all boats". A smaller city than NYC might not have been able to absorb the impact.