Live data from Hacker News

How to Build a Low-Tech Website

solar.lowtechmagazine.com

51–60 of 188 posts

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#51
post #40

Wonder if they've considered a gravity battery? As an additional benefit it'd let someone local "recharge" the battery manually rather than being 100% tied to the Sun.

I imagine huge weights hanging off the balcony of a Barcelona apartment :)

Could be pretty stylish I'd think. Chandelier with moving crystals? #LowTech :P

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#52
post #32

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What is the reason for not using your own ip?

I believe it goes against most terms of service agreements with non-commercial isp plans.

My guess is that this is mostly a way for them to object if you start using too much bandwidth. Most ISP's "guarantee" way more bandwidth than they can actually provide on a daily basis. If you're hosting a website that gets low traffic, normally, they probably will not only not know, but not care. Just my guess.

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#53
post #19

I hope they fix the RSS feed and put the whole articles in there. It should be the norm, especially on a website with "low" uptime.

I agree, but I would also expect to only receive text data and not images (or very highly compressed images). The other part of keeping the bandwidth cost of an RSS feed down is keeping a smaller number of articles in "rotation".

EDIT: I just pulled their RSS feed - 50 articles currently in rotation! 32.42kB according to FireFox of just snippets of text and links!

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#54
post #29

I'm proud of my low tech personal website: http://mrtno.com - I promise: it will never work on smartphones, just good old computers... I will build your static html page for money. Hit me up. ;)

You're proud that you make webpages that can't be consumed by the primary method most people use to get online?

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#55
Some cool concepts there.

>Static Site

This should be an obvious choice for sites not requiring dynamic elements. Also their choice of comments through email is a good solution to a problem static-made blogs have.

>Dithered Images

That won't work for every case, but is interesting.

>Default typeface

That's nice. I'm already disallowing sites to choose their own typeface. Except if a site is about design, then the typeface doesn't matter and probably I won't prefer their choice over mine.

>No Third-Party Tracking

This makes sense and I don't understand why self-hosted sites are doing it. The logs are there. Analyzing them is all that is needed.

>No Advertising Services

I'm fine with that but some sites rely on ads. I ain't aware of a method that will keep with their goals and provide ads.

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#56
post #33

Small sub-cultures, like this one, do experiments all the time in their little corner of the web. Some of the cultures die after a while, and some grow into something else, something bigger, something that starts to percolate on the mainstream surface, albeit possibly only tangental to how it started. I'm not sure I'd predict this movement will grow into something that reaches mainstream tech, but let's say I'm wrong…

Maybe there's a niche there for environmentalists:

1. If there was a way to show others:"i'm saving energy while browsing the web"

2. People using those sites could use this as a tool for telling themselves a story about themselves

3. site builders would choose this from similar reasons

Maybe the user community that will form around this will be interesting, so it would be worthwhile to join, for the sake of people and content.

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#57

> The size of the average web page (defined as the average page size of the 500,000 most popular domains) increased from 0.45 megabytes (MB) in 2010 to 1.7 megabytes in June 2018. It's the second place I see such low average size values (I'd say, somewhat reasonable), but I'm having a hard time believing in them. On a typical site, when I hit F12 and proceed to Network tab, I usually see ten times greater values. I f…

I remember from over a decade ago there was an annual contest to make the best web page that would fit into 5KB - yes, 5000 bytes. There were many impressive entries.

I'd really hoped it would catch on.

Sadly, that lightweight concept is now so forgotten that I can't even find it in a quick search. (perhaps someone else can find a pointer?)

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#58
It's a good start, but the CSS is obnoxious and definitely not low-tech, and the image dithering is a bad compromise between having real images and simply not having images at all. In short, it's an attempt at a low-tech website made by people who've never seen a real low-tech website, and probably wouldn't know Lynx if they saw it in use.

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#59
post #56
post #33

Small sub-cultures, like this one, do experiments all the time in their little corner of the web. Some of the cultures die after a while, and some grow into something else, something bigger, something that starts to percolate on the mainstream surface, albeit possibly only tangental to how it started. I'm not sure I'd predict this movement will grow into something that reaches mainstream tech, but let's say I'm wrong…

Maybe there's a niche there for environmentalists: 1. If there was a way to show others:"i'm saving energy while browsing the web" 2. People using those sites could use this as a tool for telling themselves a story about themselves 3. site builders would choose this from similar reasons Maybe the user community that will form around this will be interesting, so it would be worthwhile to join, for the sake of people a…

Option 1 has been done before:

http://www.blackle.com/

(In this case, the tangible benefits are highly debatable, especially since we moved on from CRT monitors - although I'd be interested to see data from OLED displays)

Re: How to Build a Low-Tech Website

#60
post #37

The dithering on images is actually kinda nice. Less visual over-stimulation. But whatever this site is doing with the fixed-scroll yellow block is super weird. There's a "95%" thing next to a sun - is it somehow related to the solar battery powering the server? Rather than focusing on the content, the design focuses on the infrastructure at the expense of the content. Maybe that's the point, but this particular elem…

> The dithering on images is actually kinda nice. Less visual over-stimulation. Yes, but does it also consume less power, formatting the images this way?

Sure, as it reduces overall filesize. They could have achieved similar efficiency by compressing full-color images though.
Post reply on HN