Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Ghost 2.0

blog.ghost.org

51–60 of 111 posts

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#51
post #17

Any chance of a cheaper / more minimal plan for a small personal site or blog? I suppose at that point, it's better for you for us to run it on our own hosting, though...?

My blog is hosted on a bare metal Scaleway toaster for 2.99 a month and runs great for a small personal blog. Might be nice to have more firepower for a small business that has a steady ingress of users, but for me, it's been great!

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I remember when they launched with a $5/month hosting plan, then when they raised it to $10. Just looked at the pricing page and the minimum is now $36/month (or $29/month billed yearly). That's some serious sticker shock. Is it that much better than say, Squarespace?

I am fortunate enough to be on the $10 plan, but given how little traffic my site gets cutting it in half with the smallest DO box would still be nice.

You could move from Ghost Pro to another Ghost provider without being completely manual. A quick google turned up FastComet at $2.95/month. Page claims 1-click Ghost installation, easy Ghost upgrade service, and daily/weekly Ghost backups.

https://www.fastcomet.com/ghost-hosting

Yay open source!

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#53
post #45

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Depends on your skills and preferences. I would choose Ghost since I am a JavaScript developer and would be more comfortable with a node.js solution. I'm actually so happy I was reminded about Ghost by this post, I might try to set it up myself tonight. Lacking PHP experience, I've never felt that comfortable in WordPress, but I can't deny that It Just Works . Easy to install and there are millions of users for easy…

That's basically what I'm thinking. Ghost is more inline with some skills I'd like to round out but it's undeniable that WordPress is the standard and there are so many plugins and extensions for it.

Wordpress has so many plugins and extensions because people use it as a site builder for anything and everything. Want a shop? A contact form? A newsletter? Restaurant bookings? Hotel reservations? Whatever, do it in wordpress.

If you want a technical blog, Ghost also "just works" and is far, far better, cleaner, more beautiful out of the box imo. I use their Pro version for our company's blog (https://articles.hsreplay.net/) and it's just unbelievably good. I'm so glad to have found it and I'm a huge, huge fan of not just their product but also how they run their organization.

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#54
Really looking forward to trying out Ghost 2.0

I help run a small publication with some friends and we've been having difficulties with Medium and think it's time to move to a new platform.

One problem we haven't figured out a solution to yet is importing our Medium articles into Ghost.

My current plan is to export the Medium articles, parse them, then insert them directly into the Ghost DB. Is this is a viable solution?

I guess I have two questions: - Is Medium import going to be a feature offered any time soon? - How does the SEO configuration/setting work? Is it set up on article access? on article publish? on article creation? Would inserting articles directly into the DB break this process?

Thanks!

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#56
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Hey John -- I recall seeing on your Mastodon account recently that you were interested in supporting ActivityPub for Ghost blogs. Any news on that front?

Yeah! Very interested - we have a highly voted topic for it over on the forum with some ideas, too. It's not a primary focus of the core team right now, but it's the sort of thing we'd be very interested in open source contributions for. One of the main motivations for people using Medium is the network effect. I think it would be really cool if that could be recreated in a platform-agnostic, decentralised way :)

I'm not sure how you could improve on blogrolls here, but I'm curious to see what you try.

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#57

> Multi-Language Sites > You can now configure your site to support multi-lingual content served across unique URLs with SEO-friendly, semantic templates. Now you can publish in English, German, Spanish or just about anything! About damn fucking time, pardon my language. Was a real deal breaker for some projects of mine.

Agreed

While we are on the subject, what are the plans now for the admin interface ? Community provided translation files ? Can the admin interface be translated ?

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#58
Nice. I've been using Ghost for our development blog for a few years now [0]. Every time I have to maintain our main company blog, which is Wordpress, I am astounded by the incredibly messy and cluttered admin interface. Ghost just keeps it simple and easy enough for me to publish quick dev updates on our SaaS in seconds without having to wade through a ton of crud.

I wonder if the 1.x -> 2.0 upgrade will be a simple ghost-cli command, or whether it will entail a complete reinstall on our Digital Ocean droplet?

[0] - https://workplace.hrpartner.io

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#59
I was just thinking about ghost a few weeks ago! I used to use Ghost way back when and wanted to get back to it but the installation process has become really complex and brittle. I'm a little ashamed to admit that it beat me.

The cli tool is very rigid. For some reason you cannot simply run ghost as the user ghost but you need some other user with sudo privileges to create the ghost user during the installation process. And if there's any problem at any point, it just breaks.

I will try the npm path[1] but it looks pretty arduous as well.

Is this a business decision to turn as many people as possible to the hosted version? Or is this just the state of node and modern web apps?

[1] https://docs.ghost.org/docs/using-ghost-as-an-npm-module

Re: Introducing Ghost 2.0

#60
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I know this isn't one of those two options, but I'd recommend a static site generator (e.g., Lektor, Hugo, Nikola, Pelican, Octopress). I find myself wasting less time twiddling and configuring them and instead focusing on writing content (in Markdown or ReStructured Text, no less). Additionally, I can then throw the content up on GitHub pages or AWS S3 and cut down on hosting costs.

I loved Octopress and wanted to use that. It seems like development stopped around 2016. Do know if someone forked it and there's a more updated version out there?

It definitely looks like Octopress development has tapered off. As you can tell, I haven't had to do this research for a while :-)

It looks like a lot of Octopress users have migrated to vanilla Jekyll for their needs.

Post reply on HN