Earlier quoted context omitted.
I work for a medical software company which evaluated Watson for use in our diagnostic product. It should be seen as a Good Thing that medical is a Serious Field where Non-Serious Ideas get run through the ringer and fail. And that's what happened with Watson. The word from our engineers was that Watson was designed to sell commercials, not be a useful tool in a problem space like differential diagnosis or drug react…
Theranos is a counterexample. Probably would have been outed as fraudulent if they tried to enter a more safety-critical space (ventilators, pumps, injectors, etc.), but still a bad sign for medical diagnostic industry that it got so much funding and so far along, inking huge deals before collapsing. Perhaps some good will come if it makes others in the space more cautious in the short run Next industry to keep an ey…
IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
51–60 of 79 posts
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#52IBM is a confusing one. For a while I was getting IBM powered blockchain ads coming through my Instagram feed, and I seem to remember stopping by their booth at Dreamforce a few years ago where Watson would help determine what candy they'd give you (or something like that). One thing I'd be interested to know is what they actually do vs. the marketing spin of what they do.
Sadly IBM has changed a lot and I ended up in a different role not too long after, and then leaving the company entirely a year or so later.
To answer your question, though, one of the things Watson actually did was pretty powerful speech-to-text and text-to-speech engines. Out of the box they were approaching the best in the business, and with some customisation they could beat any other solution available for purchase. It was also far easier to use in a web browser than any of the competition (I'm biased here - I wrote a lot of that code - but I don't believe I'm wrong.)
I really enjoyed working with that part of Watson.
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#53Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
This sort of sarcastic, content-free comment doesn't contribute much, and isn't a great fit for this community.
I disagree, I think it is satire showing the over-hyped nature of Watson and AI in general during this latest VC investment boom. HN still has room for humor
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I work for a medical software company which evaluated Watson for use in our diagnostic product. It should be seen as a Good Thing that medical is a Serious Field where Non-Serious Ideas get run through the ringer and fail. And that's what happened with Watson. The word from our engineers was that Watson was designed to sell commercials, not be a useful tool in a problem space like differential diagnosis or drug react…
Theranos is a counterexample. Probably would have been outed as fraudulent if they tried to enter a more safety-critical space (ventilators, pumps, injectors, etc.), but still a bad sign for medical diagnostic industry that it got so much funding and so far along, inking huge deals before collapsing. Perhaps some good will come if it makes others in the space more cautious in the short run Next industry to keep an ey…
Theranos was extremely successful at fleecing VCs and embarrassing political board members.
It's a good thing that it got so far, because it proves just how bad VCs are at evaluating successful companies and how much of the funding game is who you know.
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#56> “The message was that there are about 7,000 people in Watson Health today and this was a cost-cutting exercise. 90 days’ notice with 30 days’ severance.” If accurate, that severance benefit is just shameful, and simply not good enough from a large corporation. Absolutely no excuse for that degree of unjustifiable, unmitigated greed to offer so little when possibly damaging lives, especially for older workers who ma…
Severance packets is probably not an easy thing to negotiate when you are trying to sign an employment contract.
In general, you should ask if you’ll be required to sign any NDA, non-compete, or non-disparagement agreements, either as part of a company handbook or as standalone documents. If so, the severance package should be commensurate with the duration and condition of those.
It is common to negotiate severance equal to your salary for the duration covered by the agreements, or at least a large fraction like 30-50% of the duration, so a competitive severance package would certainly be in the range of 4-6 months of your base salary.
You can also negotiate to have company-paid insurance benefits extend past your termination date as part of severance, to avoid needing COBRA in the US.
The severance agreement should also cover anything like a company issued laptop, etc., if you are promised you can keep it after employment ends.
To get this, they’ll likely require you to sign waivers to any additional monetary claims, and draconian IP, NDA, etc., agreements. And this is why you should force the issue of negotiating severance up front and why you should walk away from companies (like IBM) that won’t negotiate.
Otherwise, they’ll announce the restructuring or layoff and then hold you over a barrel, by claiming you have to honor their company policy non-compete anyway, and pressure you to sign restrictive documents at your HR exit meeting, generally offering some insultingly low severance benefit, like only a few weeks or months of pay and no continuation of benefits.
All of this advice is specifically for junior-level employees as well. Never let anyone treat you like you cannot negotiate severance just because you’re a junior employee. Walk away from those companies.
For experienced employees, the amount of severance should absolutely be at least 6 months of pay and continued company-paid health coverage, and in many cases you can negotiate for it to fully match the duration of the non-compete or NDAs, usually 12 months.
Above all, don’t accept any baloney nonsense about “standard policies” restricting severance to a small number of weeks of pay per each year of tenure, or any of that garbage.
That’s just the standard line they feed to people who don’t negotiate. And if a company refuses to be flexible on it, walk away.
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tangentially related: how does one get their foot in the door at a medical software company? Is there a big market for such professionals?
Learn MUMPS and move to Wisconsin.
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#58IBM is a confusing one. For a while I was getting IBM powered blockchain ads coming through my Instagram feed, and I seem to remember stopping by their booth at Dreamforce a few years ago where Watson would help determine what candy they'd give you (or something like that). One thing I'd be interested to know is what they actually do vs. the marketing spin of what they do.
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Learn MUMPS and move to Wisconsin.
Is MUMPS still a thing :-) maybe I ought to dust of my RT-11 / FORTRAN skills off
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13860937
[1] https://ehrintelligence.com/news/cerner-epic-mckesson-among-...
Re: IBM Watson Health slashes workforce
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The word from our engineers was that Watson was designed to sell commercials, not be a useful tool in a problem space This is the number one thing to remember about Watson. I've worked with teams within IBM that spent years and thousands upon thousands of man-hours trying to get it to be useful in a fairly well-defined, constrained use-case. Eventually they bailed and went to what was essentially a simple decision…
I worked on a project that did a little Watson work as well. Same result as you described. The shame is decision tree based expert systems can be pretty powerful, but the tools these guys were using were not that great.