> "They are the fuel that powers a new form of technology infrastructure that is being built on top of the foundational internet protocols."
I can't get my head around this sentence.
> Bitcoin and Zcash are stores of value that allow users to participate in this decentralized application space without the need for fiat currencies.
That is exactly what collectibles are. Art has been used in this way for a long time.
https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/jonathanjonesblog/2...
> Crypto-assets produce decentralized infrastructure.
There is pro and cons on decentralized currencies. (https://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21721354-contemporar...) But is nothing new, nor nothing that needs cryptocurrencies.
Cryptocurrencies are an interesting experiment. Its intrinsic value is zero. It can be used, like other collectibles to transfer wealth. How it works when people lose confidence in them is to be seen. It is usually ugly, even for currencies backed by countries (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation).
Tulips where at least beautiful.