Live data from Hacker News

Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

marketwatch.com

51–60 of 63 posts

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#51
Or.. they could save a couple of hundred million a year by moving off of GCE/AWS into their own infrastructure... ( they have an insane $500M commit for both of these cloud providers.. higher than the $400M that all of google spent on infra in 2012 )

It's amazing that at their scale, they are still mostly in GCE. They are easily an order of magnitude larger than netflix, and at least netflix is smart enough to have built their own CDN.

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#52
post #47
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Other top companies also give signing bonuses as well as the usual vesting schedule, so I'm not sure this really evens it out.

Yeah but they don't give 2 signing bonuses right? That seems downright weird from a terminology perspective... how can you legally have 2 signing bonuses if you sign only once? :)

They mean that the signing bonus is divided into two yearly payouts instead of one. It's a single bonus.

I personally don't see what's wrong with a N/2N/3N... vesting schedule for post-IPO companies. You're buying in long term, that's the deal. Is it sided to favor employee retention for the employer? Sure. The overall comp at AMZN is pretty competitive though. That's the deal.

It makes more sense for a fiscally stable company like Amazon, which actually sees reliable stock growth and a real business model as compared to snap with neither of those things-- but that's not a criticism of the vesting schedule, it's a criticism of snap's true value. That's the thing that would keep me from a company like that, not the length of my RSU vesting periods.

Source: ex AMZN employee

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#53

I did some accidental market research on Snap with my girlfriend's 9 year-old cousin this weekend. She had tons of snaps, but informed me that they were almost all blank images. She and her friends send each other these blank images to maintain 'streaks,' which count the number of continuous days that two people have messaged each other. So attached to these streaks were the cousin and her friends that if the 24 hour…

"A metric that becomes a target ceases to be a good metric." ;)

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't see how they are "very different things". That stock has a monetary value, does it not? They could offer it to their employees in exchange for a salary reduction totaling those $34M/year. Alternatively, they could have sold that stock. Or taken a loan using that stock as collateral.

> They could offer it to their employees in exchange for a salary reduction totaling those $34M/year. It doesn't really matter. If the business is unsustainable then all such moves won't cut it anyway. Businesses typically lay people off when things aren't going well, and things aren't going well for snap. They could pay them that money today but what about tomorrow?

In theory $34M/year worth of employees should help you build a stronger company that would make $34M more next year.

In practice though, maybe Snap just can't grow that fast. Which is fine, but it's still sad that 220 people lost their jobs.

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#55

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not really, that's only $155k per person. The cost per engineer is probably around $400k.

I feel so underpaid right now it's not even funny.

Well, cost per engineer probably includes not only salary and stock but office space, amenities, business expenses, benefit programs, etc.

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#56
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even considering insurance/benefits, stock options, and various bonuses, 400K/year is a lot more compared to 150K.

Note that the 400k/year is cost per employee, which does not directly translate to "paychecks and benefits per employee". The employer pays payroll taxes, needs to pay rent on square footage for the office to support the employee, etc. That's all going into cost per employee, but isn't money the employee sees directly.

Assume 200k/year in the employee salary. Break down how much the other things you mentioned above will add?

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#57
post #19
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's correct. Source: Current AMZN employee

Correct, however they also give 2 signing bonuses, that bring you to an "equivalent" total compensation, so at least you are getting straight cash, not hoping for a stock payout that may not come.

That is not really true. It depends on how much you get in stocks. Fkr example, it is not typical for these companies to give out $200k stock/yr and then the backvested schedule is really packed against you. It is very unlikely they will give you $200k sign on bonus and make it up during year 2 as well.

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#58
post #18

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's correct. Source: Current AMZN employee

Holy hell. Are the grants massive?

My offer was competitive. With the 2yr cash bonus and the stock taking over in year 3 my total comp is projected to evenly ramp up 5-15% per year. Who knows where the stock will be until we get to the vest dates, but so far it's tracking well ahead of the 15% yearly growth that the company plans on.

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#59

I did some accidental market research on Snap with my girlfriend's 9 year-old cousin this weekend. She had tons of snaps, but informed me that they were almost all blank images. She and her friends send each other these blank images to maintain 'streaks,' which count the number of continuous days that two people have messaged each other. So attached to these streaks were the cousin and her friends that if the 24 hour…

One of my friends does this with his long-term girlfriend. I think they're at something like a 3 year streak at this point. They've exchanged username/password credentials to keep the streak alive in the event one of them forgets or my friend messes up his phone so badly he can't get it to boot. He's very enthusiastic about custom ROMs on Android so bricking his phone is not out of the ordinary.

edit: he says they've done that at least twice

Re: Snap expects layoffs to save $34M a year

#60

Someone should let them know not to keep having layoff rounds periodically. It is better to have one deep round and that's it. What they are doing creates so much uncertainty, anxiety, and kills employee morale.

I bet that each time they do the lay offs they genuinely believe that they're doing one more deep round and that's it.
Post reply on HN