Live data from Hacker News

16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

namc.in

51–60 of 154 posts

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#51

It's not plagiarism, it's a team putting the 16-year-old in front for the media attention. The crypto currency space is full of dodgy stuff, so not surprising. The author of this post seem to have it out for the girl personally, which is unnecessary.

It looks you're right. She was writing something, then the other guy was reviewing and correcting it, at least this is what she claims:

https://imgur.com/0ihzIzy

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given the author appears to be female, I suspect the irony is entirely on purpose.

I'm not sure it is. I suspect it's intended as a genuine term of endearment and the author is oblivious to the negative connotation. Still unfortunate.

I find it odd that someone who was writing a paragraph about sexism in tech (or any industry) wouldn’t be aware of the negative connotation - but your explanation could be right.

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#54

Why is this story flagged? It somehow proves the author's point.

It's difficult-to-verify flamebait, and if it's not true then it's harassing a kid.

It also reminds me of the Naomi Wu fiasco, where people thought that a woman couldn't possibly be doing all the things she said she did. And ultimately apologised.

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#55

"Such kind of people give Women in Code a really, really bad name, because sweetie, it takes tonnes of hardwork, cutting through competition, persistent dealing with sexism and lot of patience to make place for yourself in this male-dominant coveted industry." It's quite ironic that in a sentence about sexism and a male-dominated industry, the author addresses the developer by 'sweetie'.

In my experience, "sweetie" is a word older women use condescendingly towards younger men or women.

It fits in the same category as “aren’t you special”. It is pretty good way to find out you are not acting properly in an elder’s eyes.

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#57

> But after reading her blogpost, her stackoverflow/github history in an attempt to understand her struggles as a self-taught programmer; I figured that there was no struggle at all! Self taught programmers are full of numerous questions, but she didn’t seem to have any! Neither is there any progression of all the tasks she did. This is just one of possible approaches. For example, I actively ask very rarely, the mos…

Well, after a couple years of development, you have the vocabulary & terminology to search for & find your answers.

Starting out, you wouldn't have that.

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#58
post #37
post #2

This is advertisement. They use her story to promote the app. Of course she didn't write the thing, no "child prodigy" that "released an app that will change the world" in the last 10 years of apps, did. It's either a political diversity narrative or emotional advertisement for a product. But yeah, let's all waste our time holding 16 old kids "accountable" for their "unethical" behaviour, like big boy adults do, that…

Yes. "If you manage to get social media on your side by endearing them then you can lie and steal" is the better lesson to teach a 16 year old. A 16 year old can waste his or her life by this age if he or she does really badly in school or smokes weed and gets caught. I can forgive teens for a lot of silly things like lying, cheating, petty crime, etc. but not doubling down when caught and creating a social media hat…

Being a kid is not a boolean value. You don't go from "being a kid" to "not being a kid". It's gradual. Some people are still kids at 19, others are quite mature at 17.

Who knows, maybe her parents are pushing her a lot and she doesn't know how to react.

We should give people the benefit of the doubt when we don't know the full story. She'll be forgiven in 2 months anyways..

Re: 16 year old app developer: Plagiarist or Prodigy?

#60
post #37
post #2

This is advertisement. They use her story to promote the app. Of course she didn't write the thing, no "child prodigy" that "released an app that will change the world" in the last 10 years of apps, did. It's either a political diversity narrative or emotional advertisement for a product. But yeah, let's all waste our time holding 16 old kids "accountable" for their "unethical" behaviour, like big boy adults do, that…

Yes. "If you manage to get social media on your side by endearing them then you can lie and steal" is the better lesson to teach a 16 year old. A 16 year old can waste his or her life by this age if he or she does really badly in school or smokes weed and gets caught. I can forgive teens for a lot of silly things like lying, cheating, petty crime, etc. but not doubling down when caught and creating a social media hat…

>A 16 year old can waste his or her life by this age if he or she does really badly in school or smokes weed and gets caught.

I agree with the vast majority of your post, but I would say this part isn't super fair. Maybe I'm reading too much into this part, but outside of exceptional cases, we do give minors the chance to recover. I know people who had high school GPAs in the low 2s, that went to community college for 2 years, transferred to a solid university, and have a good career.

At least where I live, your records are sealed at 18 unless you have been tried as an adult (which is exceedingly rare). You can definitely recover from an offense, but it is going to make things harder.

Yes, a 16 year old doing some (alleged) unethical behavior should face some consequences, but no 16 year old should have their life ruined. Intelligence and maturity are not coupled.

Post reply on HN