Live data from Hacker News

Google forked Swift

github.com

51–60 of 78 posts

Re: Google forked Swift

#51
post #46
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I also worried having two different languages -- Google Swift and Apple Swift.

Maybe you should have tried to find out what this is about before posting it with a completely made up title?

Made-up title? Github says "google/swift forked from apple/swift". Is that wrong?

Re: Google forked Swift

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

This still leaves open speculation for why Google developers are working on Swift.

I guess that's true, so i'll be explicit about that too: These Google developers are working on Swift because they are part of a team that supports internal-facing IOS tooling. (there really is nothing down this rabbit hole, FWIW)

Oh, that's way less exciting than what I was thinking. Thank you Mr. Bee for that bubble burst.

Re: Google forked Swift

#54

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I guess that's true, so i'll be explicit about that too: These Google developers are working on Swift because they are part of a team that supports internal-facing IOS tooling. (there really is nothing down this rabbit hole, FWIW)

Oh, that's way less exciting than what I was thinking. Thank you Mr. Bee for that bubble burst.

One thing to realize, if you don't already, is that we have come to accept that everyone notices everything we do on github at this point (and further, we assume that people look to see what googlers are doing outside the google org as well, and that pretty much everything placed on github will leak, and ...)

If we were trying to keep something major under wraps, this would be an exceptionally bad way of achieving that.

The public docs we have even show that we discourage private github repos for various reasons. Our general internal answer would be "don't stage it on github at all unless you are willing to see it leak"

Re: Google forked Swift

#55
post #18

Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow. (I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)

Thank God. Otherwise this seemed like a very Microsoft/Java strategy.

or Webkit/Blink.

But good that they explained. Forking is a common strategy on Github, if one has no write access, to submit a pull request.

Re: Google forked Swift

#57
post #18

Hi! I’m one of the engineers on this. We’ve got some work we’re collaborating on - all of which is going upstream - and we wanted a shared place to stage it while we prepare PRs. I’ll be pushing a statement to our fork tomorrow. (I’m personally working on Bazel rules and contributions to lib/Syntax. If you find that exciting, please get in touch! :)

I do not think this is the process. You should raise proposal to swift community and if it gets accepted you start working on it.

Not other way around. You create fork and try to push and if they does not agree with you. You will say ok we are having our own fork.

Re: Google forked Swift

#58
If Chris Lattner (Swift Creator) is behind this. I am more than ok, else I do not think this is the process. You should raise proposal to swift community and if it gets accepted you start working on it. Not other way around. You create fork and try to push and if they does not agree with you. You will say ok we are having our own fork. reply

Re: Google forked Swift

#60
post #51
post #46

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Maybe you should have tried to find out what this is about before posting it with a completely made up title?

Made-up title? Github says "google/swift forked from apple/swift". Is that wrong?

Yes, just like putting 'President nukes turkey' would be silly thing to put in a newspaper if the president warmed up some turkey in a microwave.
Post reply on HN