Live data from Hacker News

Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

hacks.mozilla.org

51–60 of 190 posts

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#51

I've been following https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/web/Firefox56AddonW... It's surprised me the amount some people rely on addons for their workflow and the amount of effort they will be going through to resist this change come 57. For my usage, I've found Firefox Klar/Focus (which I believe already include the speed improvements from 57+?) on Android and have been extremely impressed.

>By 'as long as possible', I mean well beyond when Firefox 56 is officially supported; I hope to keep using it until it actively breaks or is too alarmingly insecure for me.

or you know, use ESR and get 6 more months of support/bugfixes.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#53

Frustrated by the new "screenshots" tool. The "save" button automatically uploads your screenshot up to mozilla servers. The "download" button saves it to your computer. It seems completely backwards. The "save" button should save it to my computer (there's no reason call something a "download" when it's already local). The "download" button should be replaced with an "upload & share" button that sends it to mozilla'…

Hopefully someone from Mozilla reads this and takes notes. I completely agree with you on this one.

File a bug.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#54

Frustrated by the new "screenshots" tool. The "save" button automatically uploads your screenshot up to mozilla servers. The "download" button saves it to your computer. It seems completely backwards. The "save" button should save it to my computer (there's no reason call something a "download" when it's already local). The "download" button should be replaced with an "upload & share" button that sends it to mozilla'…

Hopefully someone from Mozilla reads this and takes notes. I completely agree with you on this one.

I would not get my hopes up on the second part. Mozilla seems to be living in a "we know better" bubble these days, alongside Gnome and certain other big name FOSS projects...

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#55

Frustrated by the new "screenshots" tool. The "save" button automatically uploads your screenshot up to mozilla servers. The "download" button saves it to your computer. It seems completely backwards. The "save" button should save it to my computer (there's no reason call something a "download" when it's already local). The "download" button should be replaced with an "upload & share" button that sends it to mozilla'…

> Showing me where the link points when I hover the mouse over it is something so fundamental to browsing I just can't figure out why it was ever removed

Firefox 57 (and maybe previous versions, I can't remember) pops up a "temporary status bar" (for lack of a better phrase) with the link destination in it when you hover on a link (https://imgur.com/a/Vo7AZ).

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#56
post #25

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unfortunately that's also where I'll stop during at least a few months after Firefox 57 is released. Quantum is ultra fast, but my extensions are more important. Greasemonkey and Stylish, for example, have equivalent WebExtensions, but they're not as polished. Same with DownThemAll. I think WebExtensions should have matured a bit longer, with Quantum, electrolysis, and Photon being made available for all with the old…

Absolutely. I won't be upgrading and I'm already looking for alternatives, as long as crucial parts of my workflow (tree tabs, session manager) have no adequate replacement. The ugly redesign is also a thorn in my side.

Tree style trends had already been ported

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#57
post #44
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'll be doing the same, staying on 56 for quite awhile. This transition has been very poorly managed by Mozilla. I understand the advantages to Quantum but they have left a very large percentage of their extension developers hanging. Web Extensions is not mature enough for many of the large extensions to be ported but despite that they are proceeding with this transition anyhow. If I was an affected extension develop…

The good of the many outweighs the good of the few.

IMO Gutting your developer base is seldom good.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#58

I've been following https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/web/Firefox56AddonW... It's surprised me the amount some people rely on addons for their workflow and the amount of effort they will be going through to resist this change come 57. For my usage, I've found Firefox Klar/Focus (which I believe already include the speed improvements from 57+?) on Android and have been extremely impressed.

I know how he feels. Been sitting on 45 for ages now because of their hamfisted move to GTK3.

As for Focus/Klar, it is just a shell. The engine used is webview, and the oldest supported Android is 5.0 (because of an API and because that was when Webview was made updateable outside of Android proper).

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#59
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's already in Firefox Developer Edition. https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/developer/

I have developer edition. I don't see it. Is it just like Safari's where you can get extensions that provide content blocking lists?

IIRC there's an option to enable tracking protection in normal browsing on desktop. It's enabled by default in private browsing. (I can't check right now though - it's possible it's just an about:config option too.)

Firefox iOS (on iOS 11+) definitively offers those options, on Android it's private browsing only by default and I don't think there's an option to enable it in normal browsing.

Re: Firefox 56: Last Stop Before Quantum

#60
post #57
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The good of the many outweighs the good of the few.

IMO Gutting your developer base is seldom good.

Indeed. Just look at PocketPC vs Mobile/Phone/whatever.

Of all companies one would have thought Microsoft understood the value of backwards compatibility...

Post reply on HN