Live data from Hacker News

Coding the History of Deep Learning

blog.floydhub.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: Coding the History of Deep Learning

#51
post #27

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I didn't even realize this happened. Thank you for posting. Sucks because now I have less respect for Andrew. I don't understand why you'd want to cheat for a competition like this? I get it, people cheat all the time, but the field of machine learning is built on a foundation of open and shared research, and trust.

On skim-reading the article it seems they were banned from submitting entries to a competition server for 12 months because they made a significant number of submissions. It's arguable that they were gaming the system somewhat, but unless a limit was explicitly defined then this just seems like they were doing a lot of exploration in the area. Imagine if you published some research showing you'd made something that d…

1. Third paragraph: "twice a week" 2. They registered multiple accounts to get around the limit. That removes almost all doubt that the submitter knew he/she was cheating

Re: Coding the History of Deep Learning

#52
I find this history confusing. Legendre guessing by hand? Spaghetti on the wall? No mention of the massive work of Laplace and others that led up to Legendre and Gauss, or Gauss's connection of the notion to probability? This is truly a bizarre view.

And then the idea that numerical optimization accounting for the slope was novel. How does he think that mathematicians calculated for the preceding centuries?

Linear regression springs full formed in the 1950's and '60's? What happened to Fisher and Student and Pearson and all the rest?

Where's Hopfield? Where's Potts? Where's an awareness of the history of mathematics in general?

Post reply on HN