Live data from Hacker News

SPARQL Protocol for RDF

w3.org

51–53 of 53 posts

Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF

#51
post #39
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It turns out it's not feasible or desirable to just let arbitrary people make arbitrary queries. It turns out where and why exactly?

Denial of service.

You can just 408-response queries after they execute for a given number of CPU cycles. And then rate-limit per-account using evercookies + browser fingerprinting + IP hashing. You can often disallow anonymous queries altogether, while you're at it; if your data is valuable, people are usually willing to register at least a pseudonymous account to get at it.

Re: SPARQL Protocol for RDF

#52

Anybody can share some light on companies that uses semantic web technologies? Currently at university have a semantic web class but I am finding it difficult where the use case are to create value for business or startup.

We use quite a bit of SPARQL to reason over medical ontologies. It's not exactly "semantic web", but ontological knowledge (such as the Gene Database, UMLS, etc) are naturally serialized in graphs, which makes them an excellent fit for RDF triplestores, hence SPARQL. We regularly query millions of concepts with billions of relations in milliseconds. True, RDF under the hood is just a EAV model, but thinking about the identity between triples, graphs, and logic programming makes a lot of sense for us.

https://joelkuiper.eu/semantic-web

Post reply on HN