Earlier quoted context omitted.
> why do people hate it? Poorly-designed, poorly-implemented, half-baked ideas, legendary feature creep that presents a corollary to Zawinsky's Law, awful developers, clear political agendas in the devteam, Embrace-Extend-Extinguish tactics, against the basic UNIX concept of "many small apps that do one thing and do it well", an informal adoption of Windows service/logging techniques, political lobbying by the develo…
a literal RPC-based backdoor into the enforceability of the GPL Oh, I didn't hear that one before - any more info?
Systemd-free Devuan announces its first stable release candidate 'Jessie' 1.0.0
51–53 of 53 posts
Re: Systemd-free Devuan announces its first stable release candidate 'Jessie' 1.0.0
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not from my viewpoint. I'm the one installing the packages and writing the occasional unit/override unit in my daily work. I don't see those complex use cases systemd critics often point to. I mostly see the fact that I get to maintain a few lines of ini-style configuration instead of many lines of bash.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14175261
I've already commented on the fact that MariaDB service unit is 173 lines of ini-style configuration with most of the lines commented for example purposes.
So I'd still gladly trade many lines of bash for hundreds of lines of ini-config.
And sure some projects still depend on shell script wrapping, I myself did for many python services that I run in virtualenv. But I learned more about systemd and eventually could get rid of all shell script wrappers.
But even in a worst case scenario where some project might have to use shell script wrapping, it's still better than ALL projects using 100% shell script.