Live data from Hacker News

PDP-10/its: Incompatible Timesharing System

github.com

51–54 of 54 posts

Re: PDP-10/its: Incompatible Timesharing System

#51

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Oh yes, I remember you and your eminently googlable uname! I'm just glad that nobody can google the message I sent to the LISP@AI mailing list asking how to set the value of a variable. Soooooo embarrassing! I'm sure KMP's eyes rolled up to the back of his head, but then he took the time to help me out with TEACH-LISP (which Jerry Pournelle was ignorant enough to cite in a not-friendly light when he condemned LISP in…

I'm still klotz, though I use unix now.

What's this I hear from the GamerGate folks about you being a woman bureaucrat, a broad who is the worst type of mean, nasty and petty, hiding your vindictiveness behind a facade of professional-sounding language (they do say Logo is just Lisp without parens), and also a snot nosed hectoring undergrad? You've been an inspiration to us all, and the computer industry need more nasty women like you!

I heard an alternative fact that Kent Pitman develop a New Implementation of Lisp in which NIL equals T, which inspired many other popular languages like PHP and JavaScript to adopt alternative definitions of equality, based on the insight that all objects are equal, but some objects are more equal than others.

And speaking of bright 12-year-olds, I heard that David Vinayak Wallace was the youngest kid to ever have his own office at the MIT-AI Lab, and as a small brown child he once schooled Jerry Pournelle for free [1]:

    Date: Sunday, 2 January 1983, 22:48-EST
    From: David Vinayak Wallace 
    Subject: The changing face of Micro-computing...

        Date: 31 December 1982 04:00-EST
        From: Jerry E. Pournelle 

    (I re-ordered some of your statements)

                The notion that "It's too late for the parents" is
        goofy.  Bill and Sibyl Grieb have packed classes at everywoman's
        Village on using computers; they teach CP/M and customization
        and all that.

                Patience: it took far longer for the "average citizen"
        to learn enough mechanics to be able to be comfortable using
        cars than it is taking for people to get used to computers.

    I think this example shows why it IS too late. You can always find a
    few exceptions to the rule; these exceptions are a tiny (>.5%) part
    of the actual computer user. I doesn't take mechanical knowledge to
    drive a car, it takes mechanical knowledge to modify or repair an
    automobile.  most people (me included) would rather buy a vanilla
    car and just have it work all the time. I change the oil (more than
    most people do), but have a mechanic do the real work.

        The problem with adult learners are the ones I had: no one seems
        to know how to explain things in English.  You have to learn a
        lot more than you really need to in order to be able to do much
        of anything.  Some of us, though, are trying to change that, and
        a few of us are not only doing something about it, but getting
        paid to.

        The High Priest mentality in which one accepts whatever a highly
        paid computer technician tells you, is dying away in industry
        already, and the micro world ain't going to let it get a foot
        hold...

    I'm biased, but I don't think this will really work. You can't
    discuss complex concepts without the proper language. I agree that
    there is a bit of High Priest mentality and that there is no good
    effort to teach the JARGON, but every "normal language" explanation
    of anything having to do with computers comes out muddled,
    long-winded, and ultimately, unclear..

    Some of us even do it for free.

    david
[1] https://www.cs.rutgers.edu/~cwm/NetStuff/Human-Nets/Volume6....

Re: PDP-10/its: Incompatible Timesharing System

#52
post #31

Earlier quoted context omitted.

MIT-AI was always ITS. Must have been OZ.

OZ was always TOPS-20. Or Twenex, as they called it. Actually the new KS10 AI may have been running TOPS-20 briefly before the ITS port was done.

Didn't even know they eventually replaced AI with a KS10--I had left MIT by 1980-ish (was sysadmin for MIT-EECS and the EE dept LispMs) and didn't keep up much with the goings-on there.

Re: PDP-10/its: Incompatible Timesharing System

#53
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

OZ was always TOPS-20. Or Twenex, as they called it. Actually the new KS10 AI may have been running TOPS-20 briefly before the ITS port was done.

Didn't even know they eventually replaced AI with a KS10--I had left MIT by 1980-ish (was sysadmin for MIT-EECS and the EE dept LispMs) and didn't keep up much with the goings-on there.

I was looking for Ron Schnell's original Maclisp verison of the DUNNET game. He said it might be on backup tapes from MIT-EECS. But I suspect such backups do not exist any more.

Re: PDP-10/its: Incompatible Timesharing System

#54
post #52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Didn't even know they eventually replaced AI with a KS10--I had left MIT by 1980-ish (was sysadmin for MIT-EECS and the EE dept LispMs) and didn't keep up much with the goings-on there.

I was looking for Ron Schnell's original Maclisp verison of the DUNNET game. He said it might be on backup tapes from MIT-EECS. But I suspect such backups do not exist any more.

I will buy many beers if anyone can find me the original version. It was much different! Maybe better. Instead of finding yourself in a Vax/UNIX, you were inside a Dec-20 running Twenex. It used the COMND library, which simulated the COMND JRST. I wrote the elisp version trying to remember the "sort" of stuff I did with the original version, but even I would be surprised by what was actually in there...
Post reply on HN