Live data from Hacker News

Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

techcrunch.com

51–60 of 623 posts

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#51
post #24

OK, if they are so committed, where is OpenGL 4.5 and Vulkan support? Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"? Talk is cheap, let them actually do something.

Even if Safari catches up, everyone is still forced to use it on their iPads and iPhones as their mobile browser rendering engine and no competition is allowed in that space. So, it will still be "the new IE" but worse than the old IE since competition is locked out at the OS level.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#52
post #6

This comes at no surprise. I predicted that at some point desktop computers used by designers and software engineers would start approaching workstation class pricing (around 4K USD or more) as laptops took over. This will reflect the depressed demand as more people are able to get what they need done via a laptop. Apple might be one of the few manufacturers able to sell desktops at a loss, and justify it since the M…

From your mouth to Tim Cook's ears. (Although I highly doubt it: Apple seem to be too much in love of high margins on everything)

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#53
post #24

OK, if they are so committed, where is OpenGL 4.5 and Vulkan support? Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"? Talk is cheap, let them actually do something.

Even if Safari catches up, everyone is still forced to use it on their iPads and iPhones as their mobile browser rendering engine and no competition is allowed in that space. So, it will still be "the new IE" but worse than the old IE since competition is locked out at the OS level.

Indeed, that's a nasty problem. One of the reasons I have little respect for Apple.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#54
post #26

What I really want is for my state (SSD, RAM, maybe the CPU, but probably not the GPU) to be easily detachable from my human interface devices (keyboard, mouse, display). I want to be able to use a desktop in one place, then unplug a small unit which contains the aforementioned state (i.e. the equivalent of a sleeping laptop but with no keyboard or display), carry that someplace else, plug it in to a different set of…

Apple currently already does this very well via their iCloud sync.

You stick 1TB of your files in your Documents directory (or app-specific data folders..), and you can access them in any device that supports iCloud, including iPhones & iPads.

Try it, you'll like it, and you don't have to deal with physical storage devices.

I mean, have people never even tried iCloud sync?

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#55
The statement doesn't mention the outdated, underpowered, and overpriced Mac Pro specifically, which would have been helpful to the Mac faithful. A few folks I know in the video space switched to Windows because you can build a rendering rig that's over twice as powerful for less than half the price.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#56
post #5

I wish Apple never had their success with iTunes and iPhone. It was like winning lottery for them. And you know what happens when someone wins lottery. They forget about their roots and in the end, only ruin remains.

Which roots? The System 8 and 9 days, when my Mac would freeze on me every day? Throughout its history, Apple has had its ups and downs when it comes to quality on the desktop. There have been high points (System 7, OS 10.4 or so?) and low points, just as Microsoft have had their Windows 2000 and (shudder) Windows Me. There are no "roots", there are only local minima and maxima.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#57
post #24

OK, if they are so committed, where is OpenGL 4.5 and Vulkan support? Why is Safari so behind that it's now called "the new IE"? Talk is cheap, let them actually do something.

Safari is far behind ? Utter nonsense.

The team simply has different priorities in particular security and battery life which means some eg service workers take longer to implement (if at all).

That's why on my Mac unlike Chrome and Firefox, Safari isn't a memory hog that chews through battery life like it's nobody's business.

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#58
post #26

What I really want is for my state (SSD, RAM, maybe the CPU, but probably not the GPU) to be easily detachable from my human interface devices (keyboard, mouse, display). I want to be able to use a desktop in one place, then unplug a small unit which contains the aforementioned state (i.e. the equivalent of a sleeping laptop but with no keyboard or display), carry that someplace else, plug it in to a different set of…

Apple currently already does this very well via their iCloud sync. You stick 1TB of your files in your Documents directory (or app-specific data folders..), and you can access them in any device that supports iCloud, including iPhones & iPads. Try it, you'll like it, and you don't have to deal with physical storage devices. I mean, have people never even tried iCloud sync?

We're not just talking about files and folders, but the actual user as well (including all settings, etc.)

Re: Tim Cook assures employees that Apple is committed to the Mac

#60
post #22

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Off the top of my head I can think of a couple: 1) OSX was a viable operating system that was first class in the Apple ecosystem. 2) Laptops and desktops that were actually better than the competition including models geared toward power users.

Thanks! I've not much personal experience of pre-iPhone Apple. I'm curious about why OSX is no longer viable.

Mac OS X or whatever they're calling it at the moment is buggier than it used to be. 10.11 is where I really started noticing it. The OS no longer deals with memory pressure well, causing the computer to freeze up when Safari's memory usage spikes. The new USB stack in 10.11 often has me restarting the computer to get my devices working again. In addition to big things like that being broken, I'm finding more and more little things not working like they used to. I recently came across a bug that would sometimes not allow me to select a file in an open dialog with my cursor, but I could select it with the keyboard and arrow keys.

Apple really needs a Snow Sierra release to just concentrate on squashing bugs.

Post reply on HN