Is there anything this does (I've not looked at it) that a 'curl | pandoc' pipe wouldn't?
Just try it on wikipedia and you will see the diff.
Interesting idea though.
51–60 of 77 posts
In some ways, Oh By[1] performs the exact opposite role. Which is to say, Oh By allows you to transform any document into a web page.
Well, any document 4096 characters or shorter ...
[1] https://0x.co
I don't understand what is the advantage of server side processing. I have always depended on Evernote Clearly and Redability mobilizer to turn any web page into nice text which can be copied and pasted on MS Word. Then I can use Prince (http://www.princexml.com/) to batch convert docx into whatever I want. If someone finds it slow then they can enable auto capture clipboard. press ctrl+` to enable Clearly, ctrl+A to select all text, ctrl+C to send it to clipboard.
I wish if someone can work on this to make it smother for a desktop users.
PS: I also make use of reading view mode of Firefox.
I use the DuckDuckGo bang !pf to convert webpages into PDFs (got the tip from here: http://duckgobang.com ) but your tool converts to multiple file formats which is even better.
Bookmarked. I wish I would've had this back in May, while preparing exhibits for affidavits I was filing. I'll definitely be making use of this!
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It does seem to omit elements quite curiously. Just try using this submission as an example: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12403661
Actually you are right this is correctly rendered in the pdf,doc,odt,epub export but not in the rtf and txt. We are working on fix.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Sorry I forgot to mention : I generated a PDF. Later I tried a text export of the same page, some HTML remains ( elements). Using the title of the page to name the zip would be nice too.
We found some bug in the rtf and txt export, we are fixing them right now. We are going to change the way we serve the file either as user mixedbit suggested it or other that work for sure cross browser and trough proxy and so on. Thanks for the report.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You should throw one of your programmers to the tiger for that terrible error message that doesn't communicate what the problem is.
We will fix the error message to ask for people to enable javascript. And now because you ask for it we throw one to the tiger, now let's hope we have enough programmers:)