Live data from Hacker News

The implosion of the daily fantasy industry

espn.com

51–52 of 52 posts

Re: The implosion of the daily fantasy industry

#51
post #4

With user acquisition costs of "$190 per user for DraftKings and $110 for FanDuel" [0], what, besides long term casino-style gambling addiction, can hope to recover the costs? And unlike casino gamblers, don't 'bro-classic' people tend to grow out of these things after a while? [0] http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2015/10/30/draftkings-fa...

Generally speaking, insurance industries can pay these CAC costs and turn a profit.

Re: The implosion of the daily fantasy industry

#52
post #37

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Publicly run gambling is interesting. I mean, a bookie is a bookie, but it seems a safer bet if your bookie is a publicly accountable institution.

Yes, also: profits from the operation are going to the state, which presumably puts them to better use than the local gangster.

I think the idea of state monopolies over "vices" (see also, government-run liquor stores) is to remove the profit incentive from running these businesses while still providing legal options for customers so they don't enrich criminals.

EDIT: to address the sibling comment. if companies that manage the monopolies earn a fixed fee rather than per-unit, the non-profit motive is still attained.

Post reply on HN