Live data from Hacker News

Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

blog.flexvite.com

51–59 of 59 posts

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#51

My favorite tool for finding available domains while discovering product/company name ideas is http://wordoid.com - made by a HNer, I think.

Wordoid is great. Another favorite of mine is: http://www.nxdom.com/

Shameless plug: I threw up http://domaingroovy.com/ to keep track of sites like these. Maybe someone else will find it useful.

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#53
post #51

My favorite tool for finding available domains while discovering product/company name ideas is http://wordoid.com - made by a HNer, I think.

Wordoid is great. Another favorite of mine is: http://www.nxdom.com/ Shameless plug: I threw up http://domaingroovy.com/ to keep track of sites like these. Maybe someone else will find it useful.

Nice, some new ones to add to my list: http://internetmindmap.com/available_domains

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#54
post #35

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's a lot more expensive than App Engine though. You quickly get into hundreds of dollars a month range for just a few extra features and two running processes.

That's a humorous exaggeration, right? 2 x processes + 20GB database = $51/mth Most people won't require every addon, and there's a free or cheap option in every case. Yes, you can spend "hundreds of dollars a month" but not easily

2 x processes + 20GB database + unlimited bundles + SSL ($20-100/month depending on your needs) == $91-$171/month. And that's for just two thin processes with a few extra features that are generally required for most apps.

It jumps to more than $200 if you want just one more Thin process or a background worker, etc.

I'm not saying that there's anything wrong with Heroku's pricing, but I wouldn't considering it a "cheap or free web-based tool".

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#55
post #39

For browser compatibility: browsershots.org Litmusapp may be nicer and have summaries, but it's hard to beat browsershot's simplicity, breadth, and free-ness. Though I have yet to see any provide decent testing for anything dynamic (videos, perhaps?).

http://crossbrowsertesting.com is also a good choice (I am biased), we have live testing (VNC) and screenshots. we are working on video.

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#56
post #34

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Mailchimp is awesome. Don't know how it compares to Campaign Monitor. If you're a belt & suspenders type, use a Wufoo form and send that to MailChimp, then you can easily switch later.

The email collection tools in Campaign Monitor are totally free. You just pay when you send mail. When I was organizing Startup Bootcamp, I emailed both CM and MailChimp to ask for a donation. MailChip offered us a discount, but CM gave us an extremely generous number of credits that easily covered our needs. Using CM is a breeze. Originally we were using a Google Doc as a signup, and felt the need to switch once we…

Thanks! It's really quite hard to get a comparison of tools that take some usage to understand.

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#57
The recommended site vyew.com looks good, but

  http://vyew.com/
301s to

  http://vyew.com/site
which in turn 301s to

  http://vyew.com/site/index3
Two 301 redirects, and a damn ugly default URL to boot—I have a hard time trusting them to get anything else right. Am I wrong?

Re: Cheap or free web-based tools for your web startup

#58
post #35

Wait, no Heroku? It should definitely be listed in the Price-Scalable Hosting section. Like AppEngine it's also free starting out, and super easy to scale. Plus it's all rails, so you don't even have to learn any App Engine API.

I think it's a lot more expensive than App Engine though. You quickly get into hundreds of dollars a month range for just a few extra features and two running processes.

I'm not sure I trust Google App Engine; it's a roundoff error for Google. Why should they care if something goes wrong? Heroku cares about Ruby webapp deployment the way Google cares about search.
Post reply on HN