Live data from Hacker News

Master Plan, Part Deux

tesla.com

51–60 of 705 posts

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#51
post #32

Forgive me if this is a silly question but when he talks about "beautiful solar-roof-with-battery", is he talking about car roofs or roofs of buildings? An electric car with a solar roof that charges all day would be pretty cool.

That clicked when he talked about Tesla Semi. A roof installation on the trailer would make sense and might generate a 'useful' amount of power.

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#52
I was hoping to see another zero to one approach with the master plan where he is taking on some other industry goal. I totally get that part deux is still very, very ambitious and one that no other company can truly realize. But if we're just talking about Musk's master plan, I'm curious why he didn't talk about the synergies with his other company, SpaceX. Tesla and SpaceX both rely on vehicles & transport while SpaceX and Solar City both revolve around innovation in energy/physics. I'm wondering if Tesla's mission/vision will dwarf SolarCity's when solar harvesting in space could be one of many opportunities to partner with SpaceX. /rant

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#54
post #32

Forgive me if this is a silly question but when he talks about "beautiful solar-roof-with-battery", is he talking about car roofs or roofs of buildings? An electric car with a solar roof that charges all day would be pretty cool.

Buildings. A car roof isn't enough area and isn't pointed in the right direction.

Not if it's a trailer.

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#55
> Enable your car to make money for you when you aren't using it

I really like this, but the laws of supply and demand still apply. If you live in a sparsely populated area there's not going to be much for your car to do.

Great for those in urban centres, but then if you lived there why bother owning at all when there will be more cabs to hail?

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#56
I am in no position to question EM. But I was hoping he would give some good explanation for spending resources on SolarCity acquisition but nothing. Nothing in this master plan explains why SolarCity was bought other than some hand wavy explanation about inherent difficulties of two separate companies working together. It still doesn't seem like a good purchase for Tesla specially at the moment. Solar car and SolarCity seem to only have the word solar in common :) TBH I am still fuzzy how expensive purchase of SolarCity can benefit a solar car manufacturing even in long run.

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#59

I hear about bus drivers and truck drivers getting into accidents due to drowsiness enough that it's a constant worry whenever I'm on the highway next to one. I wonder if I'd feel safer if i saw a Tesla Semi knowing that were wasn't a human behind the wheel. Should autonomous vehicles be identified as such (special lights or label) so that real humans can know not to be erratic around it?

Should humans be monitored and have driving privileges revoked if they drive erratically?

Historically yes, if you cause problems your licence is revoked and in some cases your vehicle is seized.

I look forward to the rise of the machines, with humans losing driving privileges for simple things like wandering across lanes without signalling, running red lights, hitting pedestrians or bumping other vehicles in the parking lot.

Re: Master Plan, Part Deux

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Where has he mentioned semis or buses? I thought I had been paying close attention.

I'm sorry, I've read/watched every interview or press release or tweet he's given in the past 5 years. I couldn't tell you exactly where individual bits came from.

Here ya go: http://electrek.co/2016/01/26/elon-musk-tesla-truck-video/
Post reply on HN