Live data from Hacker News

I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

security.stackexchange.com

51–60 of 74 posts

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#51
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or, invite them in, and (politely) try to pitch a conversion to atheism. I usually get sooo close, then you see that programming snap back into place (you'll see their expression change to one of terror), and they suddenly have to leave really fast. Mormons are more fun for this, but Jehovah's Witnesses are a laugh riot.

I haven't seen enough of the universe to feel confident that I'm correct in my atheism, and I haven't felt the hand of Nothing touch my heart and send me out to evangelize It.

Would you like a phrase to quickly and easily describe that state of being?

Apatheistic Agnostic. You're not concerned with the issue, it's too big and universal and we're too human. You're not convinced of anything, and frankly, since whatever does or doesn't come after this is inevitable and inescapable, what's the point of endless debate during our finite lives?

Who knows?... and who could even know? No one, that's who.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#52
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm always curious about how people react to unwanted solicitation. When it happens to me, as soon as I realize I say "sorry" and close the door. When my door rings unexpectedly, I'm more worried it might be someone I know, as I'm usually in the middle of my work day, as in hacking stuff in my underwear.

This has only happened to me in apartment buildings; it's either some proselytizers, or people pretending to work for Con-Ed trying to scam me out of money. Either way they're trespassing, and in the latter case actively trying to harm me. The last time this happened, I technically wasn't on the lease, so my wife discouraged me from following them around the building, introducing myself to the neighbors and breaking…

I find the phrase, "I'm as a armed as I am dangerously and violently psychotic" to be a fabulous ice-breaker. Since I'm neither armed, nor psychotic, it's a true statement and not my fault that they probably didn't get that part.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#53
post #44

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I haven't seen enough of the universe to feel confident that I'm correct in my atheism, and I haven't felt the hand of Nothing touch my heart and send me out to evangelize It.

Would you like a phrase to quickly and easily describe that state of being? Apatheistic Agnostic. You're not concerned with the issue, it's too big and universal and we're too human. You're not convinced of anything, and frankly, since whatever does or doesn't come after this is inevitable and inescapable, what's the point of endless debate during our finite lives? Who knows?... and who could even know? No one, that'…

> Apatheistic Agnostic

Actually I call myself an apathist among my friends. I don't care if there's a god, but if there is one, I doubt if it cares about me, and I doubt that it cares whether I believe in it or not.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#54
post #49
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I engage Jehovah's Witnesses, but not in the dick way that capital A Atheists might (I'm a small a atheist). I try to learn what they're about. They're generally nice people.

what do you hope to gain by talking to them? I'm assuming that by capital A, versus lowercase a; atheists, you are trying to underscore the differences between people who understand that religion is a hoax but it doesn't affect me right now so I'll let it pass, and those who have been directly affected by religion and it's evils and see no other way but to fight it as hard as they push it? I will try to explain why t…

> what do you hope to gain by talking to them?

They're people in my community. I like to be friendly with my neighbors, if not actual friends.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#55

Maybe the wrong place for a newbie question, but here goes. IF I am running up-to-date versions of Windows and Chrome, and I click on this link, is it game over? Or do I get another chance to refuse installation of whatever malware is in the payload?

You have to double click the downloaded file to execute it under Windows Script Host

And then if you have UAC (or whatever it's called) turned on, you'll get a warning that the .exe you're about to run is unsigned, right?

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#56
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Would you like a phrase to quickly and easily describe that state of being? Apatheistic Agnostic. You're not concerned with the issue, it's too big and universal and we're too human. You're not convinced of anything, and frankly, since whatever does or doesn't come after this is inevitable and inescapable, what's the point of endless debate during our finite lives? Who knows?... and who could even know? No one, that'…

> Apatheistic Agnostic Actually I call myself an apathist among my friends. I don't care if there's a god, but if there is one, I doubt if it cares about me, and I doubt that it cares whether I believe in it or not.

It's a pleasure to make your digital acquaintance, I feel the same way.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#57
* Disclosure: I used to work for Facebook's security team and focused on threats that impacted users on the platform. *

The post outlines in some detail a common attack done by some actors known as BePush/Killim. I made a request for help in fighting these clowns months ago on a private security working group. Here's the post below which outlines a good amount of detail about the hacks and motives. If you are interested in tracking these actors yourself, it's pretty easy once you find one of their command and control servers.

Example: https://www.passivetotal.org/passive/userexperiencestatics.n...

From there, we can see the actors are using Cloudflare to obfuscate their infrastructure, but we can make a pivot based on the WhosAmongUs IDs (dsafagegg2 [1] and dsafagegg [2]) in order to find more websites owned by these guys. It's a rats nest that extends to hundreds of domains registered weekly. Servers are typically hosted in places where legal action is difficult meaning the attacks seldom stop or go down completely.

  [1] https://www.passivetotal.org/trackers/WhosAmungUsId/dsafagegg2
  [2] https://www.passivetotal.org/trackers/WhosAmungUsId/dsafagegg
-----------------------------------------------

As promised, below is a quick high-level summary of the malware outlined in the subject. We've been dealing with the malware for months and while some would call is spam, we consider it malware simply because any of the executables or Chrome extensions could be changed to steal passwords, credit cards or every document off a system. We welcome any help in dealing with these actors and would also be interested in new ways to combat malicious extensions, both Chrome and Firefox as those are only increasing in usage.

If you would like more information on the technical details of the binaries, extensions or other loaders, feel free to shoot me a message. If there's enough interest, I will just spam the list, but would prefer to keep this to the higher level points, so others gain a better understanding of the threat.

-= Summary =-

BePush is a set of Turkish-based actors who use innovative techniques to spread malicious code and spam through social networking sites and ad-based networks. Those involved in the development of BePush malware are constantly adjusting their TTPs to account for changes in detection or disruption. Actors favor multiple levels of obfuscation through the use of short-url redirectors, third-party hosting providers and multi-stage payloads. Despite high infection rates, local law enforcement has yet to take an interest in pursuing those actors involved.

-= Infection Process =-

Based on our logs, primary infection processes tend to occur through direct traffic, followed by Facebook and various ad providers. Shortened URL links are shared among users which typically traverse through a series of redirects to a landing page mimicking Facebook infrastructure and using porn as a lure to install a plug-in. Depending on the attacker behavior, payloads may be delivered in the form of a Google Chrome extension (hosted within the store) or through an executable (likely AutoHotkey, but could be Pyinstaller based) that later replaces Chrome with a version of Chromium with their malicious extension.

Once installed, malicious code will make use of the Facebook Graph API in order to make requests/posts on behalf of the infected user using a stolen access token. In order to establish a high infection count, the malicious code will often create pages with malicious links, post statuses/comments to the user's friends and spam within certain application pages. Once the spreading routine completes, the process generally begins again with the infected user's friends.

-= Motives and Capabilities =-

It appears the primary motivation for the BePush actors is the money gained through the sale of Facebook likes, followers or various ad-network and affiliate partners. In some cases, Facebook observed BePush actors including a bundled bitcoin miner, but it never appeared to gain much popularity.

From a capabilities perspective, actors involved with BePush appear to pay attention to how their code is detected. When numbers begin to dwindle, changes to the code or 3rd-party providers are made. Actors demonstrate a level of understanding in .Net programming, Python, JavaScript and techniques used to detect spam. We have also observed the actors repurposing browser exploits, but we never saw these used against users.

-= Third-Party Provider Usage =-

BePush favors the use of free and open infrastructure in order to keep their campaigns alive long enough to get a strong infection foothold. The following providers have been observed in some capacity:

  - Amazon AWS - Used for hosting content
  - Dropbox - Used to host binaries
  - Box.com (http://box.com/) - Used to host binaries
  - Bitly - Used for redirection
  - Tinyurl - Used for redirection
  - Godaddy - Used for redirection
  - WhosAmungUs - Used for campaign tracking
  - Stellar - Used for bitcoin wallet hosting
  - Imgur - Used for redirection 
  - Dot.tk - Used for redirection
  - Google - Used for redirection, Chrome extensions and binary hosting
  - CloudFlare - Used to obfuscate real infrastructure
  - Microsoft Azure - Used to host binaries
-= Detection and Research =-

BePush has a limited set of providers they prefer to use and through industry relationships, we have been able to put pressure on the attackers. Here are a couple items we noticed when doing disruption work that helped in making a larger impact against the group.

Using passive DNS data to identify other domains sitting on the same IP address (these guys don't use a lot of unique servers) Use ESET (Facebook) or Microsoft (Kilim) AV signatures to identify new binaries being used Polling whos.amung.us (http://whos.amung.us/) tracking pixels in order to identify/gauge recent campaigns Reaching out to 3rd-parties with domain and hash combination for takedown

-= Reference Hashes and Domains =-

  www[.]filmgetir[.]com

  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/9e4484240df6e891b2a07c1ff2345e0864dd8b54e005c58388c6556cdc7cc120/analysis/

  www[.]kingtr[.]click

  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/9e4484240df6e891b2a07c1ff2345e0864dd8b54e005c58388c6556cdc7cc120/analysis/
  www[.]pornokan[.]com

  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/c5eeef4da2c64e8633b1f00745fecb0b692be27d4b615df086201754b07ebe60/analysis/
  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/3566452da48ba0fa31b11deae561b4d5f2a1385e83fd5537a021e75b649664b6/analysis/
  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/1a0163780f07aeaafd9e94fbe628b3f354b25afbec1f7c6e6e401cc7c06d909a/analysis/
  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/b216915643628834acd60e7ae9647e51baca636d8b05ea66857d40c9d04172a8/analysis/
  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/80d9d1df0d859fe6759bba7077be1a15eea477774c91e789e9d5988f19f0a023/analysis/
  https://www.virustotal.com/en/file/940bc772a2e301e15a326e667a318942dd840149afa4031245dd125c645330ab/analysis/

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You have to double click the downloaded file to execute it under Windows Script Host

And then if you have UAC (or whatever it's called) turned on, you'll get a warning that the .exe you're about to run is unsigned, right?

It is not an exe. But even without UAC, there is another layer of warnings that has been there since XP SP2 for unsafe file types downloaded from the Internet.

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#59
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Right, but to pretend that it doesn't happen in common conversation is absurd. Atheists frequently evangelize. It is a religious belief.

> Atheists frequently evangelize. It is a religious belief. They evangelize, but its more of ideology that concerns religion rather than just a belief. The main problem with atheism is the definition: absence of religion, this is such a derogatory word as if believing in deities should be the norm. Agnostic is even worse seat: declaring that you have no clue but probably are somewhat spiritual. If you don't like reli…

> as if believing in deities should be the norm

Well, de facto, it IS the norm. And it has been so for a long time

Re: I was tricked on Facebook into downloading an obfuscated script

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It would be extraordinarily unusual for someone to have my number but not be able to call from the phone storing it. Anyone I'd be an emergency contact for, I have their number(s). There are theoretical problems with not picking up, but no practical ones that I've ever come up with or had suggested to me.

In an emergency situation do you think that everyone will be calling from their own phone? What about people who list you as a medical emergency contact or work emergency contact?

Do you expect that they wouldn't be either calling from their own phone, calling more than once, or leaving a voice mail? There are two people who I would lay money on knowing my phone number by heart, and only one of them lives within an hour of me. Everyone else will be stuck looking it up on their phone.

I often go out without my phone, have the ringer off, have a dead battery, or ignore the ringing because I'm driving. It's ridiculous to assume that I'm instantly available 100% of the time, or that I wouldn't treat different incoming numbers with different priorities.

Post reply on HN