Live data from Hacker News

Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

news.ycombinator.com

51–60 of 103 posts

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#51
post #39
post #32

How does this become basic income?

I'm sure this is controversial for me to say, but we can pay for a basic income by printing money and handing it out. The government likely won't even think to do this because it's so counter-intuitive. By creating our own currency, we can be the ones to "print" the money and hand it out.

That doesn't really answer my question. Let me rephrase that: Let's assume you successfully created a new currency and let's assume it does not result in hyperinflation. What mechanism will be used to give everyone a cut? Have you even crunched the numbers on how much money you will need to give everyone a cut?

How many dollars per month are you planning to distribute to "everyone" and by what mechanism do you intend to distribute it?

Thank you.

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#54
I have a question about bootstrapping. You want GD to be circulating. It seems to me, initially, most merchants will hold on to their GD until they convert to USD. This will cause you to burn through your reserves. How do you incentivize merchants to spend their GD and get the currency to keep circulating instead of having, Basic Income -> merchants -> USD?

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#55
post #54

I have a question about bootstrapping. You want GD to be circulating. It seems to me, initially, most merchants will hold on to their GD until they convert to USD. This will cause you to burn through your reserves. How do you incentivize merchants to spend their GD and get the currency to keep circulating instead of having, Basic Income -> merchants -> USD?

You're right. Especially at the beginning, merchants won't find many other businesses who will take their GD, so even if they wanted to spend it, their options would be limited. But they do have a few options, including:

1. Merchants can use their GD to pay their employees bonuses. Those employees, who also have a limited number of places to spend it may then turn around and spend their GD back at their employer again. It would be a way for merchants to lock in business.

2. It's easy to frame Gresham Dollar as part of a social cause. Merchants can use their participation in Gresham Dollar as a way to market themselves to socially-conscious customers. Maybe they even donate some of their GD proceeds back to the community. The community is then likely to spend some of that GD right back at the merchant who donated it.

I'm open to other ideas. Does anyone have any suggestions?

In any event, my assumption is that, to start, the Gresham Dollar market will look mostly like Basic Income -> merchants -> USD, and that in order for us to survive this initial bootstrapping phase, we'd require sufficient USD reserves to offset the attrition of GD.

Ideally, we would bootstrap fairly quickly. We would want to take in USD reserves faster than the rate of GD attrition. Then, as Gresham Dollar achieved wider adoption, that attrition rate, as a percentage of total GD in circulation, would decline.

I imagine that some of our initial investors will be expecting us to fail, but they would have invested anyway because the worst case scenario is that they paid for a bunch of poor people to get some free money for a few months. And the best case scenario is that they contributed to an economic revolution and made a profit in the process.

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#56

How do you make money?

If we succeed, we'll control the world's money supply. Along the way, we'll likely use a small, publicly-disclosed portion of the investments we receive for salaries and other expenses. We'd switch over to spending only GD as soon as is reasonable.

Our investors earn pre-determined returns on their Future Gresham Dollars (see other comments), so they make money no problem.

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#57
You incentivize merchants with new customers that will shop exclusively at GD accepting merchants. After you have these merchant agreements in place, it will then be easier to incentivize the merchant suppliers to accept GD in order to stay competitive in their market.

The model, as I see it here so far, does not take into account the administrative costs of doing business. I'm talking about human resources, database servers, credit cards for BI recipients, transaction fees over credit networks... how do anticipate meeting these overhead costs?

Also, in regards to BI, I am also curious about the mechanism. One of the arguments for BI is that it eliminates the overhead costs associated with various agencies of social welfare and passes that savings on the public. Nevertheless, GD is a transition currency that will not originally be available to everyone as BI, which means that there will need to be some sort of selection mechanism (which is hopefully not as costly or beauracratic as current US welfare systems).

As the currency gains popularity, more FGD is sold and the USD reserve goes up. How do you quantitatively measure the popularity of GD? Will you be collecting data on transactions that feed into this analysis? What metrics are used to calculate the acceptable reserve level? Is this what will influence the production and distribution of new GDBI?

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#58
You incentivize merchants with new customers that will shop exclusively at GD accepting merchants. After you have these merchant agreements in place, it will then be easier to incentivize the merchant suppliers to accept GD in order to stay competitive in their market.

The model, as I see it here so far, does not take into account the administrative costs of doing business. I'm talking about human resources, database servers, credit cards for BI recipients, transaction fees over credit networks... how do anticipate meeting these overhead costs?

Also, in regards to BI, I am also curious about the mechanism. One of the arguments for BI is that it eliminates the overhead costs associated with various agencies of social welfare and passes that savings on the public. Nevertheless, GD is a transition currency that will not originally be available to everyone as BI, which means that there will need to be some sort of selection mechanism (which is hopefully not as costly or beauracratic as current US welfare systems).

As the currency gains popularity, more FGD is sold and the USD reserve goes up. How do you quantitatively measure the popularity of GD? Will you be collecting data on transactions that feed into this analysis? What metrics are used to calculate the acceptable reserve level? Is this what will influence the production and distribution of new GDBI?

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#59

You incentivize merchants with new customers that will shop exclusively at GD accepting merchants. After you have these merchant agreements in place, it will then be easier to incentivize the merchant suppliers to accept GD in order to stay competitive in their market. The model, as I see it here so far, does not take into account the administrative costs of doing business. I'm talking about human resources, database…

You incentivize merchants with new customers that will shop exclusively at GD accepting merchants. After you have these merchant agreements in place, it will then be easier to incentivize the merchant suppliers to accept GD in order to stay competitive in their market.

Yes. Gresham Dollar would creep up the supply chain.

The model, as I see it here so far, does not take into account the administrative costs of doing business. I'm talking about human resources, database servers, credit cards for BI recipients, transaction fees over credit networks... how do anticipate meeting these overhead costs?

We'll take a small portion of the investments we receive and put it toward paying operation/capital expenses. The rest of it goes toward boosting our USD reserves. I won't get into specifics because I don't have the specifics worked out. Even if I did, they'd be boring.

One of the arguments for BI is that it eliminates the overhead costs associated with various agencies of social welfare and passes that savings on the public.

Basic income is more than just "efficient welfare." Consumer spending is the bedrock of any economy and basic income enables that. The labor market does not exist for the purpose of distributing consumer income, so naturally does a poor job of it. We, as a society, have devised all sorts of rules and regulations to try to force the labor market to be our economy's primary income distribution system, but it's an uphill battle.

Nevertheless, GD is a transition currency that will not originally be available to everyone as BI, which means that there will need to be some sort of selection mechanism.

Initially, there will be two selection mechanisms and they're both very simple:

1. We'll pick a city to start in, we'll sign up some merchant partners in that city, and we'll hand out a certain number of basic accounts every day to poor people in the city. These accounts receive the "basic income." We'll repeat this process from city to city.

We'll partner with local social services organizations, such as homeless shelters and soup kitchens, in finding people to give these accounts to. What we'll physically hand out will be tokens (e.g. something like debit cards) representing accounts in our system. Merchants will use the tokens to receive payments from the appropriate accounts.

2. On the other end of the spectrum, anyone can sign up for a starter account online. A starter account doesn't receive the basic income. Starter accounts allow you to:

1. Hold a GD balance. 2. Accept payments in GD 3. Buy Future Gresham Dollars

In the long run, we will upgrade all starter counts belonging to individuals into basic accounts. In the short run, individual starter accounts participate in the Gresham Points system, which is the other selection mechanism for determining who receives a basic income.

When an individual starter account user converts USD to GD (e.g. by transferring money from a linked bank account), that starter account earns a corresponding number of Gresham Points. Periodically, the individual starter account with the highest number of accumulated Gresham Points will be upgraded to a basic account. Although most new basic accounts will be handed to low income people, a small number (orders of magnitude smaller) will be created, in this way, as a part of the Gresham Points game. In addition to motivating people to use Gresham Dollar, the Gresham Points competition helps build our reserve of USD.

Users can monitor the high scores to determine how many additional points they need to win a basic account.

How do you quantitatively measure the popularity of GD?

There are a bunch of different variables we can track including:

1. Number of users 2. Number of merchants 3. Size of USD reserves 4. Velocity of GD (how often it gets spent) 5. Number of transactions.

Will you be collecting data on transactions that feed into this analysis?

We will record every transaction in a ledger.

What metrics are used to calculate the acceptable reserve level? Is this what will influence the production and distribution of new GDBI?

Good question. If our USD reserves dip to the level where we can only fulfill our existing promises and nothing more, then the system goes into Disruption (explained in another comment). We probably would not expand to a new city without first securing enough USD reserves to provide USD-backed basic incomes to its poorest citizens for at least a couple of months.

But we don't want to expand too slowly, because, as you said, popularity helps us build our USD reserves. We would want to bootstrap ourselves while riding as much hype as possible.

Lots of details still to be worked out.

Re: Apply HN: Gresham Dollar – Viral Currency for Basic Income

#60
post #51
post #39

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'm sure this is controversial for me to say, but we can pay for a basic income by printing money and handing it out. The government likely won't even think to do this because it's so counter-intuitive. By creating our own currency, we can be the ones to "print" the money and hand it out.

That doesn't really answer my question. Let me rephrase that: Let's assume you successfully created a new currency and let's assume it does not result in hyperinflation. What mechanism will be used to give everyone a cut? Have you even crunched the numbers on how much money you will need to give everyone a cut? How many dollars per month are you planning to distribute to "everyone" and by what mechanism do you intend…

Let's assume you successfully created a new currency and let's assume it does not result in hyperinflation.

What do you mean by "success"? For Gresham Dollar to have truly succeeded, it will have ultimately become be a single world currency that basically everyone on the planet uses.

What mechanism will be used to give everyone a cut?

Gresham Dollar is a purely digital currency. Everyone would have an online PayPal-like account and we would simply add the basic income to people's accounts as a continuous stream. So, if the income were, for example, $10/day, you'd get 1 cent every 86.4 seconds. The basic income is always going to be new money that didn't exist before. We don't take it from anywhere.

Have you even crunched the numbers on how much money you will need to give everyone a cut?

I'm not sure what you mean by "how much money." The basic income is a continuous stream of newly-created money for every person on the planet. We don't need the money. We are the money.

Assuming a basic income of $10/day, and 7 billion people on the planet, we'd be creating 70 billion new dollars (GD) every day. Prices will equilibrate to a level that depends on whatever the basic income happens to be. If we had a basic income of $20/day, prices would equilibrate to double the $10/day price level.

It might sound weird to you that prices could remain stable if we're constantly pumping new money into the economy, but it's actually true.

To illustrate, let's imagine what would happen if we weren't constantly pumping new money into the economy. Let's say that the supply of money is fixed. There are a certain number of dollars in our economy and there will only ever be that number of dollars. Furthermore, let's imagine that the only thing humanity produces is bananas and our level of banana production is also fixed. Over time, more and more of that money will accumulate in people's savings accounts, leaving less money actively circulating and therefore less money to chase each banana. The price of bananas drops and you have deflation.

So even in an economy where the amount of wealth we're producing and trading is fixed, we need to continually inject new money to keep prices stable. The simplest and most elegant way to inject money into an economy is through a basic income. A basic income, because it's evenly distributed throughout the economy, results in the minimum possible amount of market distortion.

But in the real world, we humans are always improving our technology and figuring out ways to produce more bananas. This means that even if we have found the appropriate basic income to keep fixed the amount of money circulating, that same amount of money will be chasing more and more bananas and we'll still see price deflation.

The answer to this problem is a continually increasing basic income. If we want to keep prices stable, we want to scale the amount of the basic income to keep pace with the amount of additional real wealth that humanity is trading.

How many dollars per month are you planning to distribute to "everyone"?

The number of dollars doesn't really matter in the long term. What matters is that the amount is continually increasing as the amount of wealth we trade increases.

I chose $10/day as an example because 10 is a nice round number. $10/day is also an income level that will make a difference for poor people in America while still being low enough that we only need a few million USD to back a basic income for thousands of people for a few months.

But as nice as $10/day is for an American, it would be really huge for someone living in India or Mexico today.

Unifying the world economy under a single currency removes a barrier preventing regional price alignment. Providing everyone with a basic income in that currency actively pushes price differences to even out to some degree. Since people receive their basic incomes regardless of where they live, they'll have incentive to migrate to locations where the cost of living is lower. Prices in cheaper locations will rise while prices in more expensive locations will fall. This migration will stabilize once regional prices reach levels such that people are, on average, indifferent to location.

I wonder if some of the initial Gresham Dollar basic income recipients will take their basic income and flee to Mexico so they can be rich off their $10/day. =)

Even though the overall effect of a basic income is unlikely to be inflationary, there will necessarily be pockets of inflation and deflation around the world. This is not a bad thing because the net effect is progress toward more consistent and reliable prices across and between regions.

Thank you.

You're welcome. Thanks for asking these questions!

Post reply on HN