Nice and creative use of a restrictive system. While most people will just use it for piracy, I'm sure a good few will end up contributing to Wikipedia as well. How many of today's hackers got interested in computers through pirated content first?
Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
51–60 of 150 posts
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#52Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#53The author puts encyclopedic knowledge and movies in the same category ("information") and seems to be arguing that they both should be freely available. I'm not saying that current copyright system isn't completely screwed up and in need of reform, but I don't think disregarding content creators is an optimal solution.
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#54Something went wrong because this was posted a day ago https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11347144 But I'm glad this has got its due notice at last.
From the guidelines: > Are reposts ok? > If a story has had significant attention in the last year or so, we kill reposts as duplicates. If not, a small number of reposts is ok. In other threads, the mods explained that the dupe detector is weaker than expected on purpose so good stories get a second (and third, ...) chance to get popular. Sometimes the first submission don't get attention by bad luck (wrong time, an…
BTW, Gus, at least some of the time I've been trying to use your preferred "Previous" format with points, days, and comment count when it seem relevant and useful (i.e. when it won't be killed as a dupe). You suggested it in a comment a few days or weeks ago. It's more work, but I'd bet it's more helpful, especially for new users. Most of the time, adding dupe links is simple and should happen quickly since it prevents split discussions and manual merges.
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
The pirates (arrr!) are essentially using steganography when they hide videos in jpeg images or pdf files. Steganography can (sometimes, depending on the algorithm used) be detected, but in the end it's an arms race between one side using more sophisticated steganography and the other side using more sophisticated detection mechanisms.
I'd be very surprised if that were the case. The impression I got from the article was that they were just changing the extension on video files so that they could be uploaded as PDFs. For it to be steganography would require the PDF of the video file to still be readable as a PDF, which is vastly more work and takes much more technical knowhow (and the ability to download a decryption program) than just renaming.
Pretty sure, with gifs and zip you can just combine them together with one append command and you are done.
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#56I'm sure breaking and stealing cars is a valuable skill for an activist in the US.
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#57Maybe this is just a detail of Vice's way to sell their articles, but how is providing free services to people who could otherwise not afford them 'colonialism'?
The colonialism is attempting to enforce Western mores and laws about copyright on the Angolan population. As well as Wikipedia's own culture which is pretty Western itself. While Wikipedia may be attempting to colonize Angola with some of its community conduct values, the population there has another view of Wikipedia's purpose which might be equally valid.
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#58Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe I missed the part of the article where it said that people in Angola are being forced to use Wikipedia.
This is the objection to zero-rated services. Angolans get to use the internet, but they only get to use the zero-rated bits of it. And they have to use them in ways that westerners approve of. It comes down to money, really. Do we put a "you must be this rich to use the internet" sign up on the planet's communications, or do we allow people to bring their culture and ideas to the party despite their poverty? This wh…
Re: Angola’s Wikipedia Pirates Are Exposing the Problems with Digital Colonialism
#60Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd be very surprised if that were the case. The impression I got from the article was that they were just changing the extension on video files so that they could be uploaded as PDFs. For it to be steganography would require the PDF of the video file to still be readable as a PDF, which is vastly more work and takes much more technical knowhow (and the ability to download a decryption program) than just renaming.
Depends on the file type, there are a few that ignore anything in certain areas and if you change the extension should just work. Pretty sure, with gifs and zip you can just combine them together with one append command and you are done.
+-----------+-------------+
| extractor | zip archive |
+-----------+-------------+
The extractor, when run, simply opens itself as a ZIP archive and decompresses itself.So you could append the ZIP archive to an image file and then decompress the result without having to remove the image beforehand.
But you cannot concatenate several ZIP archives and expect a working bigger archive.