Let's see when Facebook converts. For some reason they love to serve Flash based SOLELY on user agent. So you have a chrome fork without flash? Here, watch this flash. Oh, and this gif is now flash as well. I can't quite figure out why.. but I would vote for incompetence. Can't see any business motivation for doing that.
Flash-Free Video in 2016
51–60 of 203 posts
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#52Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Twitch.tv, sadly.
There's Beam [0], it's quite new but I've been quite amazed by their work. They invented some sort of own protocol built on web standards [1]. Also, their streams are actually live (i.e. minimal delay), it's all HTTPS and a lot of their work is open source. [2] I hope this is going to be a thing. 0: https://beam.pro 1: http://forums.beam.pro/topic/168/where-we-re-at-with-html5-v... 2: https://github.com/watchbeam
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#54Good! Now move to https!!! Secure the damn web.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#55Two steps forward, then three steps backwards. Great.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#56Has anyone here that is excited about HTML5 video (and Flash being dead) ever written an enterprise video player? It's a total nightmare in HTML5. You have little control over playback and insight into video events. Meeting business requirements (that Flash fulfilled) with HTML5 video ranges from hard to not possible.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#57I happen to hang out around these parts so I understand the reasons for it, but if I didn't it would probably make me mad. It would feel like websites were just trying to get around my flash blocker and shove their autoplaying media in my face. Just goes to show how different things can look from the developer side of things.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#58Are NYT videos DRM enabled or use a codec that FF doesn't support on Android? FF should be just using the platform provided codecs and if it works in Chrome it should work in FF - but I just get a Video/Mime Type unsupported error on FF when browsing NYT.
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#59Fantastic news and congrats to the NY Times team. Does anyone know, who at this point still continues to use Flash?
For Spotify, there's a years old request on the forums [0] their support keeps linking people to, but it doesn't seem like they're doing anything about it.
Deezer uses Flash for "security reasons" [1] and they don't plan to use HTML5.
Someone mentioned Google Play might work, but I haven't tried that yet.
0: https://community.spotify.com/t5/Live-Ideas/Integrate-HTML5-...
Re: Flash-Free Video in 2016
#60I know everybody here hates flash (for excellent reasons!) and is happy to see it die. But, as a user who doesn't work in tech, I really miss the ability to enforce click-to-play loading of videos. From my pseudo-outsider perspective, the switch to HTML5 has been really frustrating. I happen to hang out around these parts so I understand the reasons for it, but if I didn't it would probably make me mad. It would feel…