My problem with Medium is that it lends this amazing aura of credibility to everything that is published on it. I think they've hit on the design equivalent of the brown note (of South Park fame) which makes readers mentally incontinent vis-a-vis the credibility of the source of the actual text... Or maybe it's just me?
Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
51–60 of 199 posts
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Static site generators are not a good answer for non-engineers, especially if customizations are necessary. I had self-hosted WordPress on Dreamhost until I got kicked off due to a viral post and my site deleted. Recovering my posts and learning how to use Jekyll/GitHub Pages in less than 24 hours was fun.
"Static site generators are not a good answer for non-engineers, especially if customizations are necessary." Could be. Content and templates could be hosted on S3. Unfortunately I haven't found a good admin GUI for a static site generator yet. I use Jekyll myself and as a developer that's great, not something I would recommend to normal users though. Which is a shame because most users (or small businesses) don't re…
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#53My problem with Medium is that it lends this amazing aura of credibility to everything that is published on it. I think they've hit on the design equivalent of the brown note (of South Park fame) which makes readers mentally incontinent vis-a-vis the credibility of the source of the actual text... Or maybe it's just me?
Self-hosted blogging still has a place in this ecosystem!
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#54Getting hosted by someone else is incredibly convenient. They take care of all the work of maintenance, security, reliability, and even give you tools to increase your visibility on the web and design your blog. IMHO only hobbyists or people with a very good reason should self-host. If you don't like one company's terms, look into the many other blog providers out there.
You could still happily roll your own Wordpress site but have it hosted with a managed provider. Also stick something like Headway Theme in there and you get a pretty easy setup even for not technical folks.
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think they've just managed a good design - mostly by resisting the temptation to show off as so many designers do. It's very minimal - if anything it looks similar to the hand-written no-styles websites that academics often write (that look like http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ )
Actually more like http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ :-)
About the only good point on the list in that link is line width. But all the items about formatting text combine to make it so that there is so much less information on the screen. I'd much prefer to read the other website.
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#56Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Actually more like http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ :-)
Sure, but the Google Analytics loader code on either of those is larger than all of the HTML boilerplate and CSS combined. At least the first one has snarky HTML comments!
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#58No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
This article is correctly using a rhetorical question for discussion. (The answer to the headline is "maybe")
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#59I "self-host" using Pelican + S3. It's super cheap (< $1/month) and pretty easy, the only real downside is that all of the Pelican themes are really ugly, and I'm not good enough at design to make a better one.
Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?
#60I "self-host" using Pelican + S3. It's super cheap (< $1/month) and pretty easy, the only real downside is that all of the Pelican themes are really ugly, and I'm not good enough at design to make a better one.