Live data from Hacker News

Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

robertnealan.com

51–60 of 199 posts

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#51
post #5

My problem with Medium is that it lends this amazing aura of credibility to everything that is published on it. I think they've hit on the design equivalent of the brown note (of South Park fame) which makes readers mentally incontinent vis-a-vis the credibility of the source of the actual text... Or maybe it's just me?

Dang, guess you gotta pay attention to the actual ideas written on it instead of judging them by their presentation. Bummer.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#52

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Static site generators are not a good answer for non-engineers, especially if customizations are necessary. I had self-hosted WordPress on Dreamhost until I got kicked off due to a viral post and my site deleted. Recovering my posts and learning how to use Jekyll/GitHub Pages in less than 24 hours was fun.

"Static site generators are not a good answer for non-engineers, especially if customizations are necessary." Could be. Content and templates could be hosted on S3. Unfortunately I haven't found a good admin GUI for a static site generator yet. I use Jekyll myself and as a developer that's great, not something I would recommend to normal users though. Which is a shame because most users (or small businesses) don't re…

I recently launched Static Website Manager (https://www.staticwebsitemanager.com) which aims bring static sites to a non-technical market. Would love to chat more if you have questions.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#53
post #5

My problem with Medium is that it lends this amazing aura of credibility to everything that is published on it. I think they've hit on the design equivalent of the brown note (of South Park fame) which makes readers mentally incontinent vis-a-vis the credibility of the source of the actual text... Or maybe it's just me?

Like others who have posted in this thread, medium.com in the URL is a signal to me that the author is more likely to not be credible.

Self-hosted blogging still has a place in this ecosystem!

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#54

Getting hosted by someone else is incredibly convenient. They take care of all the work of maintenance, security, reliability, and even give you tools to increase your visibility on the web and design your blog. IMHO only hobbyists or people with a very good reason should self-host. If you don't like one company's terms, look into the many other blog providers out there.

You could still happily roll your own Wordpress site but have it hosted with a managed provider. Also stick something like Headway Theme in there and you get a pretty easy setup even for not technical folks.

Even considering Wordpress probably makes up 50% of the compromised sites on the internet, due to its terrible security track record and that nobody patches their own blogs?

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#55
post #30

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think they've just managed a good design - mostly by resisting the temptation to show off as so many designers do. It's very minimal - if anything it looks similar to the hand-written no-styles websites that academics often write (that look like http://motherfuckingwebsite.com/ )

Actually more like http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ :-)

First thing on loading that link was "yuck, the contrast is fucked", and sure enough, item #2 is "less contrast is good".

About the only good point on the list in that link is line width. But all the items about formatting text combine to make it so that there is so much less information on the screen. I'd much prefer to read the other website.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#57

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Actually more like http://bettermotherfuckingwebsite.com/ :-)

Sure, but the Google Analytics loader code on either of those is larger than all of the HTML boilerplate and CSS combined. At least the first one has snarky HTML comments!

But most people either have that code cached or blocked.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#58
post #3

No. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...

This article is correctly using a rhetorical question for discussion. (The answer to the headline is "maybe")

Betteridge's law still applies. Most headlines with a question are really trying to convince you that the answer to that question is yes, when it often isn't. Besides, rhetorical questions in headlines are tacky and shouldn't be used.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#59

I "self-host" using Pelican + S3. It's super cheap (< $1/month) and pretty easy, the only real downside is that all of the Pelican themes are really ugly, and I'm not good enough at design to make a better one.

I'm assuming Pelican is a generator. I don't understand why there aren't better, simple solutions to do this and just host the site in a bucket on S3. Most people will fit in the free tier of usage and you stay in complete control of your domain and content.

Re: Is Self Hosted Blogging Dead?

#60

I "self-host" using Pelican + S3. It's super cheap (< $1/month) and pretty easy, the only real downside is that all of the Pelican themes are really ugly, and I'm not good enough at design to make a better one.

You needn't be limited to using Pelican themes. Pelican uses Jinja2 for templating, so it's very simple to migrate templates over to the platform with an hour or so (if that!) of tweaking.
Post reply on HN