> Because 50% of my code (hyperbole intended!) was a direct copy/paste of Stack Overflow. And another 40% was a copy/paste from other scripts. Either my colleagues’ scripts or my own. It became repetitive. And there was little creativity or learning involved. How is this even possible? I've never had a job where copying and pasting code would have helped. It blows my mind every time I read this kind of claim, to the…
Pretty much everything I do requires parts that came from SO, but it's more like I get a bunch of puzzle pieces and then think about a smart way to assemble the big picture.
Then there's the profiling and arrangement that only makes sense on my particular codebase. No way to SO that.