Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't know what your definition for "satisfies intellectual curiosity" is but this article definitely does it for me. Sexuality and gender issues are fascinating , as is developmental psychology.
I find the subject fascinating (and, FWIW, extremely personally relevant). But I didn't find this article at all satisfying; too much is anecdote, the Guardian is too far from neutral (and I say that as a reader and fan of a lot of their work), and parts of it ring false in terms of my own experience (contrast e.g. e.g. Wandering Son ( Hōrō Musuko ), which felt very true-to-life for me - though I guess it's possible…
Nor would I call anecdote a weakness. Anecdotes are legitimate, fascinating, and indispensable to good conversation. Half if not more of the best material on HN is anecdotes. That's how communities function, so it's deeply ok.