Maybe you should start building a sustainable business model, instead of whining because people who are annoyed with ads and trackers started effectively blocking them. If your content adds value to your visitors' lives, then charge for it. If the only revenue stream you can rely on is ads, then probably there is a problem with the stuff you offer not being valuable enough to people. I don't want this to sound grumpy…
> If the only revenue stream you can rely on is ads,
> then probably there is a problem with the stuff you
> offer not being valuable enough to people.
Not quite.What people are willing to pay for has a large social/cultural/conditioned element. It's a crux of the entire problem.
The vast majority of people still attribute zero cost to ads. When you start charging $1 for your offering, now you're the one site among your competitors that's charging money. Maybe some HN nerds will care. Whoopdee doo. Nobody else does. The rest of the world isn't going to take their credit card out of their wallet when they can endure a banner ad instead.
Oh wait, they can just install an ad blocker the day they actually do care. Or maybe when their kid or significant other or buddy installs an adblocker on their browser like I did for my parents and they won't even realize the trouble it ever saved them.
See, I think that we will be soon on the cusp of a shift that needs to happen before we can replace ads at all, and it's more than just something a website can do by themselves by adding a paywall or whatever solution that doesn't work for most websites that people seem to conjure up in response to these issues.