As usual, the pricing is not very friendly, and apparently designed to lock your data into AWS or exploit your weak negotiating position once you buy in. While you can send in 50TB for $200, taking the same 50TB out costs an additional $1500 charge (50000 * 0.03). [assuming they are not transferring the data over the Internet, the cost to AWS should be the same or cheaper for reading]
Amazon Snowball
51–60 of 202 posts
Re: Amazon Snowball
#52As usual, the pricing is not very friendly, and apparently designed to lock your data into AWS or exploit your weak negotiating position once you buy in. While you can send in 50TB for $200, taking the same 50TB out costs an additional $1500 charge (50000 * 0.03). [assuming they are not transferring the data over the Internet, the cost to AWS should be the same or cheaper for reading]
[0] https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/
$4300 = 10000 * $0.09 + 40000 * $0.085
Re: Amazon Snowball
#53I'm interested in hearing about how they are going to do this.
Re: Amazon Snowball
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
I have to admit, while it makes for good storage lock-in, I was impressed that they only charge 3 cents/GB to get the data back out. Someone else in this thread thought $1500 was expensive to get 50TB back out. If you use this for disaster recovery, you could get all of your data back onsite quickly for a very low (comparative) cost, versus trying to provision high speed connectivity.
Don't forget, there's the ongoing storage cost at S3, which also adds up really quickly.
$10/TB/month? Where else can I store data reliably that cheap? (Yes, Backblaze is half that price. I hope they become a worthy adversary to AWS S3 to drive prices further down).
Re: Amazon Snowball
#55Earlier quoted context omitted.
Same service needs to run the other way for the same price. $200 to get all your data shipped to you on an appliance/hard drive.
The service is called AWS Import/Export so it seems you probably can get them to export the data to a snowball for you to get your data.
Re: Amazon Snowball
#56Re: Amazon Snowball
#57Earlier quoted context omitted.
Kept scrolling and looking for a picture of said label, to no avail.
I found an image here: http://techcrunch.com/2015/10/07/amazon-launches-snowball-a-...
Re: Amazon Snowball
#58http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snowball
Reminiscent of when Microsoft called an overlay dialog a "floater" and all the South Africans and Brits in the room started laughing.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=floater (the 2nd definition)
Re: Amazon Snowball
#59As usual, the pricing is not very friendly, and apparently designed to lock your data into AWS or exploit your weak negotiating position once you buy in. While you can send in 50TB for $200, taking the same 50TB out costs an additional $1500 charge (50000 * 0.03). [assuming they are not transferring the data over the Internet, the cost to AWS should be the same or cheaper for reading]
$1700 is amazingly cheap when you consider that it costs $4300 [0] to transfer that same 50TB out of EC2. [0] https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/pricing/ $4300 = 10000 * $0.09 + 40000 * $0.085
According to multiple sources, Internet transit in the US now costs less than 1$ for a 1 Mbps line for large deals, which translates to 1$ for 324GB, which translates to 0.003$ / GB.
Amazon charges 15-30 times that.
(it appears that traffic can be much more expensive in places other than the US and presumably Europe)
Re: Amazon Snowball
#60- Kindle's E-Ink
- AWS IAM / KMS/ SNS
- Amazon Carrier? (perhaps in the future?)
- GPS-powered chain-of-custody tracking (AWS working on it, perhaps Amazon Drone delivery in the future?)