Earlier quoted context omitted.
The local Walmart setup chip & signature a couple of months ago. Magstripe transactions are denied by default on my card that has the chip.
The first few times it was really slow, but recently it's only added a couple seconds to the transaction. I really think this will be a non-issue in a couple months.
EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
51–59 of 59 posts
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
I noticed this recently as well at Walmart. Tried to swipe my card and it didn't work, swiped again and it didn't work. Finally bothered to read the error message, which was "Insert Card into Slot at Bottom of Terminal." My experience in Europe has been with Chip and PIN, I wonder why we're gravitating toward Chip and Signature.
Me, too. Found http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/10/chip-pin-vs-chip-signatur... "Most card issuing banks and Visa don’t want PINs because the PINs can be stolen and used with the magnetic stripe data on the same cards (that also have a chip card) to withdraw cash from ATM machines. Banks eat the ATM fraud costs. This scenario has happened with the roll-out of chip cards with PIN – in Europe and in Canada."
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#53It's depressing to see the US still treating EMV cards like a strange exotic novelty while Europe is already upgrading those again and moving to NFC-enabled cards after EMV has worked without any major issues for 20 years . For small, repeated transactions you just hold the card to the reader and are done in 1-3 seconds. The first transaction on each reader and random transactions every 20-50$ (and all transactions a…
Chip-and-PIN was invented to make card transactions more secure at a time when most transactions were 'offline', i.e. there was no direct connection from the card terminal to the issuer, so it wasn't possible to ask the issuer whether a transaction should be allowed. To attempt to combat card skimming, the chip was added, and terminals upgraded to require the PIN to be entered if the card had a chip [1].
Nowadays almost all transactions happen 'online', so the bank is asked whether the transaction should be authorised first (this is why there is sometimes a delay on terminals as they connect to the issuer). This means the issuer can run their own fraud detection before the transaction takes place. In the US they took this a step further, and just used that instead of requiring a signature to be collected for most purchases. To the end user it's an even better experience than NFC provides.
[1] This also means you have no reason to give your card to anyone, when the card needs to be inserted above/below the PIN pad, so it prevents another opportunity for skimming.
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Me, too. Found http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/10/chip-pin-vs-chip-signatur... "Most card issuing banks and Visa don’t want PINs because the PINs can be stolen and used with the magnetic stripe data on the same cards (that also have a chip card) to withdraw cash from ATM machines. Banks eat the ATM fraud costs. This scenario has happened with the roll-out of chip cards with PIN – in Europe and in Canada."
I don't quite follow this... how do you use your card at an ATM if it doesn't have a PIN? In Europe cards had PINs for this, even before EMV.
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#55It seems to take a couple of extra seconds to process the transaction, compared to a swipe. I'm surprised that this bothers me so much. I might use Apple Pay more often if this doesn't get improved.
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#56EMV cards are a big improvement for security but the UX is a step big back from mag swipes. Here's an example from a recent stop at the ATM. * I dipped my card and then was told to reinsert the card and leave it in for the duration of the transaction. I wonder how long it will take for me to insert/leave by default instead of dipping. * The machine mechanically locked my card into the slot until I had taken my cash,…
1. I understand coming from only swipe but in my mind (Sweden) you insert your card while you perform the entire transaction as a identifier compared to swiping. That's at least how me and my friend think about it after asking him. 2. Machines in Europe has been doing this for a long time and it's never been an issue. I guess in the rare case power goes out (aren't these machines on UPS?) it you just call the provide…
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#57It's depressing to see the US still treating EMV cards like a strange exotic novelty while Europe is already upgrading those again and moving to NFC-enabled cards after EMV has worked without any major issues for 20 years . For small, repeated transactions you just hold the card to the reader and are done in 1-3 seconds. The first transaction on each reader and random transactions every 20-50$ (and all transactions a…
> The first transaction on each reader and random transactions every 20-50$ (and all transactions above a $20 limit) will require chip+PIN verification Not necessarily. In the UK (at least, at the banks where my fiancée and I hold accounts), you need to enter your PIN: 1) On the first transaction after activating a new card 2) On transactions above £30 (~$45) starting 1st Sep 2015 (however apparently some terminals h…
When I went to the MetroCentre the other week, I did about 5-6 contactless transactions in a day (probably somewhere around £100 spent total), by the end of the day my card got declined and I had to use Chip&Pin, so it does definitely happen in the UK, though the limits may be quite high (wonder if this may also vary based on the bank, I'm with a certain bank which refused to give me a contactless card until I had a credit check).
This is the first time since I got the card (quite a few months ago) that it was actually declined however, so it's quite a rare occurrence.
As for the EMV spec, It sounds like the terminal is the one that decides whether or not to request Chip&PIN:
During kernel processing, the kernel will determine from the acceptance environment and issuer settings in the card whether a cardholder verification is needed for the transaction. Methods that may be supported are online PIN and signature – offline PIN is not suitable due to the “card in field” timing issues.
what is the kernel?
The kernel contains interface routines, security and control functions, and logic to manage a set of commands and responses to retrieve the necessary data from a card to complete a transaction.
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#58EMV cards are a big improvement for security but the UX is a step big back from mag swipes. Here's an example from a recent stop at the ATM. * I dipped my card and then was told to reinsert the card and leave it in for the duration of the transaction. I wonder how long it will take for me to insert/leave by default instead of dipping. * The machine mechanically locked my card into the slot until I had taken my cash,…
Every ATM I've use in the UK will wait for you to remove the card before finishing the transaction (e.g. dispensing the receipt or cash you asked for). If you lose the card in the machine, a new one can be mailed to you (within two days IIRC), though this has never happened to anyone I know. I've never seen a "Application" choice, so I can't really comment on that. Is that US specific? Overall, I've found the UX on n…
Re: EMV Switch This Week Could Threaten Many Businesses in U.S
#59Earlier quoted context omitted.
Indeed. There were a bunch of security objections to the system by Ross Anderson et al at launch; it has turned out that EMV is not at all the weak link compared to online transactions, which are where most of the fraud is. Or skimmed ATMs, which don't seem to use the chip.
As far as I can tell, skimmers in Germany still copy the (fallback) magnet stripe and PIN, to use those in countries that don't require EMV. It's far easier than trying to break EMV chips.