Live data from Hacker News

Block and Unsubscribe

gmailblog.blogspot.com

51–60 of 131 posts

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#51

Hilton hotels, can't unsubscribe because of account login forced. This is my new fix!

Bye bye Web Summit... after unsubscribing from your email list several times I get sent your emails time and time again, and your affiliate events, and your newsless announcements, etc. Thank you Google.

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#52
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I believe it uses a header the sender includes with the email http://www.list-unsubscribe.com/

Cool. I doubt those intrusive marketing emails will ever include that header though.

it's a neat feature for legit websites not wanting to end up on spam filters, though

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People use the Report Spam button on things that they explicitly signed up for all the time, and Gmail has adjusted its behavior to match how users use it rather than try to persuade them to instead do the right thing.

Interesting. Isn't there an information loss since now they would have to infer the motive to decide whether to blacklist the sender?

Yes. I end up with loads of useful emails in the Spam folder. Mostly it's stuff like shipping and billing notifications. I check the Spam folder daily, now, since so much useful mail ends up there.

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#54
post #50

Hilton hotels, can't unsubscribe because of account login forced. This is my new fix!

It's amazing how many unsubscribe links, which are mandated by law, are broken or flaky. I just "report spam" now when that happens, and it totally works. No regrets.

Exactly, "report spam" already serves well as "block" as well as "unsubscribe".

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#55
post #17

> That’s why you can now block specific email addresses in Gmail [...] Future mail will go to the spam folder (and you can always unblock in Settings). It's nice to have a one-click button for it, but this was already available by configuring a filter. You just need to select all emails from a particular address and then choose to always mark them as spam or send them directly into the trash. From the headline I was…

Any feature complicated enough to implement is indistinguishable from a missing feature.

Would be interested to hear why it took so long to add this one-click functionality, which is common across clients, to Gmail. There must have been some internal disagreement on its implementation?

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#56
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yep. I think less sophisticated users would be intimidated by creating a filter and this solves for that.

Yeah, the filter config for GMail is very full-featured. Like there are a dozen actions you can take on a mail, all listed on a single popup. Makes sense to provide an easier path.

But no regexes :(

Re: Block and Unsubscribe

#60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What I don't understand (possibly noob question), is the scenario where I get spam and I click on "Report spam" to be prompted with "Unsubscribe and report spam". I'd never subscribed to it so why am I asked whether I would like to "Unsubscribe". Is it that the spammers got hold of my email from somewhere and "Subscribed" me automatically? Shouldn't "Report spam" implicitly imply that it's not a subscription?

People use the Report Spam button on things that they explicitly signed up for all the time, and Gmail has adjusted its behavior to match how users use it rather than try to persuade them to instead do the right thing.

Opt-out lists are a big issue.

A checkbox hidden somewhere that's enabled by default doesn't mean that "I have subscribed" to the mailing list, both in the common sense and also is prohibited in many legal jurisdictions (not USA, AFAIK), leaving a default checkbox simply doesn't count as obtaining consent, it is a well known 'dark UI pattern' that even the consumer protection laws have understood and explicitly implemented.

Such messages are just another kind of spam, and the right thing to prevent this, naturally, is to block the sender as a spammer. Underneath there is somewhat proper a mailing list that supports unsubscription, so an unsubscribe message can and should also be sent, but it doesn't change the fact that all the subscribers were added without their informed consent - if you built a system with opt-in by default, then you yourself built a system where it is impossible to say that you actually want to subscribe, the only provided checkbox then represents a choice between the default (no informed consent) and an explicit refusal of consent.

Post reply on HN