Earlier quoted context omitted.
The IRGC is fighting for survival, most Iranian want them gone, and Iran will be better as a whole if the IRGC is all dead. Don't try to conflate the government with the country, they don't always align.
> Iran will be better as a whole if the IRGC is all dead Which is an impossibility. We're talking about a military force of more than a million religiously fervent men that have martyrdom as a core tenet of their religion. They are not going anywhere, and assasinating their leaders and bombing their bases will not make them easier to enforce anything on.
Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
491–500 of 658 posts
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#492Earlier quoted context omitted.
This seems to be a fairly well thought out war that's already killed many Iranian leaders, including: Ayatollah Ali Khamenei – Supreme Leader Major General Abdolrahim Mousavi – Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces Major General Mohammad Pakpour – Commander-in-Chief of the IRGC Brigadier General Aziz Nasirzadeh – Minister of Defense Mohammad Shirazi – Head of Supreme Leader’s military office Ali Larijani – Senior nation…
The way this war is shown to us (West) is very loopsided - Iran was never going to be able to stop the bombing and they knew it. But they still retain most of their ability to blow up anything they want around their country, which is most of oil and gas fields in the Middle East, and this time they actually proved it. We like to think we're winning, but are we ? Iran leadership is supposedly decimated, missile capabi…
Only places that falsely believed to be immune due to being of same blood, like Qatar.
>Replace Khamenei with his son - a guy who had all of his family blown up to pieces by US / Israeli
Rumor has it son was also blown up, just not completely (supposedly disfigured with leg missing) and is most likely hiding in Moscow.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#493Earlier quoted context omitted.
Iran is fighting for survival, Israel and the US are fighting by choice. They attacked Iran not the other way round. US bases, even if also used by UK which aides US it their war, are legitimate targets. US imperialism is the greatest threat to the world.
[flagged]
That sounds very bad when you translate it into German.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#494Earlier quoted context omitted.
Religion extremism
It’s resistance against genocide.
It’s tempting to turn adversary into heroism. But the truth is Iran has supported the laughter of Gazans and Yemenis to keep war away from its shores for a few more years. These proxies need to rule ruthlessly, like their parent, because they’re violent, ruthless and cruel regimes. Powerful. But no paragon, and certainly not one who give two shits about Western notions of who is committing genocide or war crimes against whom.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#495Earlier quoted context omitted.
Are you implying other countries have to join in? Iran is only a threat because the US and Israel decided it was time to murder some Iranians. The US and Israel are more of a threat to the entire world.
let's not pretend this attack happened in a vacuum. Iran has been funding murderous militias like Hezbollah , Houtis and fighting a proxy war for years.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#496Earlier quoted context omitted.
That's horrible, but has nothing to do with this.
It really should make you want the Totalitarian Shia Theocracy running Iran to collapse.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#497Earlier quoted context omitted.
> no one marches for IRGC - not even supporters IRGC has a lot of support. We tend to think of educated Iranians from abroad. But they have their share of religious nutters.
There are plenty of educated Iranians within Iran. What's with the structural under-estimation of countries that are not quite like the West? Seriously, Iran has - especially given the sanctions they've been under - consistently outperformed everybody's expectations in terms of capabilities. Assuming they will get their coveted atomic weapon (and there are several paths to that, which I hope they will not be able to…
> their resolve to get that weapon will be ten fold what it was three weeks ago
They’ll probably get it. I’m almost convinced we’ll see the Middle East or Europe get nuked in our lifetime. Tehran hits Tel Aviv; the latter hits every major city or something.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#498Earlier quoted context omitted.
There are plenty of educated Iranians within Iran. What's with the structural under-estimation of countries that are not quite like the West? Seriously, Iran has - especially given the sanctions they've been under - consistently outperformed everybody's expectations in terms of capabilities. Assuming they will get their coveted atomic weapon (and there are several paths to that, which I hope they will not be able to…
You’re misreading my statement. Educated Iranians are plentiful. They’re the ones international people are familiar with. They almost universally hate the IRGC because they see it destroying their country. For every educated Iranian, however, they have tens of their equivalent of Koran thumpers. And those people will support the IRGC’s economic consolidation among their billionaire elite. > their resolve to get that…
> I’m almost convinced we’ll see the Middle East or Europe get nuked in our lifetime.
There is a good chance of that, and the last 3 weeks have made it much more likely that that will happen.
> Tehran hits Tel Aviv; the latter hits every major city or something.
That is possible. There are multiple possible nuclear flashpoints, Russia vs one of their neighbors, Pakistan vs India or the other way around, Israel vs Iran or the other way around, the USA because Trump has a bad hairday against pick-your-target.
Of all the parties that have nukes I figure China, France and the UK are the most stable.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#499Earlier quoted context omitted.
I am willing to hear you out on this, but the Pentagon employs a lot of personnel, can you demonstrate that the sentiment you describe was actually representative? Clearly those who do believe in this intervention don't have the same incentive to speak up as those that disagree with it. It is also rather vague to conflate warnings with disagreement: They can believe in the validity of an approach but still have the l…
Google is your friend To get you started: https://www.newyorker.com/news/letter-from-bidens-washington... https://www.axios.com/2026/02/23/iran-strike-trump-gen-dan-c...
> Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine has been advising President Trump and top officials that a military campaign against Iran could carry significant risks, in particular the possibility of becoming entangled in a prolonged conflict, according to two sources with knowledge of those internal discussions.
"that a military campaign against Iran could carry significant risks, "
specifically
"could carry"
Sounds like people doing their job, and informing a president of potential outcomes, precisely what I predicted above. The media always makes things seem more adversarial than what it turns out to be.
Re: Iran launched unsuccessful attack on UK's Diego Garcia
#500Earlier quoted context omitted.
Not sure how credible but iranintl.com has >36,500 killed in 400 cities... Our Editorial Board has now obtained more detailed information provided by the IRGC Intelligence Organization to the Supreme National Security Council. they are an Iranian opposition outfit funded but the Saudis. ( https://www.iranintl.com/en/202601255198 )
iranintl, yah that's an instant rejection. There are zero verified sources of any mass killings by the Iranian government. In fact all evidence points to Mossad agents committing the mass killings of Iranian government officials as caught on video, including the wrestler that was just executed for killing a police officer with a machete, on video.