X users are unable to post “Signal.me” links

Post by atoav » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 2:15 PM UTC

concordDance wrote: post #325

atoav wrote: post #258

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It is very simple: 1. Inherited rich kids like Elon often have a strong feeling that they are better then the rest of humanity. 2. But it turns out if you are a leech on society like that sooner or later people stop accepting that (remember: he pays less in taxes and gains more in government subsides than most people) 3. So in order for people not to turn against you sooner or later you need to keep them split into s…

Even granting that, you would want MORE LGBTQ+/minority speech. The more energy people spend arguing with each other about culture war, the more dividee they are and the less they have for trying to change inequality. Trying to silence LGBTQ+ etc people goes directly against the goal you posit.

Post by soulofmischief » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 2:15 PM UTC

scarab92 wrote: post #287

soulofmischief wrote: post #269

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If you have verifiable information that debunks or improves upon existing text in the article, which meets the standards of the organization (not self-published, etc), I promise you that your edits will be considered and integrated. There is a Talk page for a reason. The system is not perfect, and is still vulnerable to certain kinds of subterfuge, but the more critical thinkers involved in the process, the better. I…

You seem to have completely missed what I was saying. Journalists get suspended from social media platforms for doxing all the time. These events are not newsworthy, and wikipedia articles are not written about them. The problem isn't the content of this article, it is that the article exists at all. It only exists because wikipedia editors apply different notability thresholds to one side of politics than the other.

Post by failrate » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 2:18 PM UTC

sunaookami wrote: post #158

buyucu wrote: post #128

Earlier quoted context omitted.

twitter is not anyone. you would expect a company of this size with millions of users to have checks and tests.

Legit question: How would you test something like this? It's not like you can have automated tests with million of random links. And these URLs are certainly not hardcoded.

Post by croes » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 2:19 PM UTC

alt227 wrote: post #359

croes wrote: post #288

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's not how capitalism works because the between the companies and the customers is a Mismazch in power and information. That's why governments make rules to protect those with less indormation and power. According to your logic cyberbullying is just free speech. Should I wish for you to by cyberbullied, so you see first hand that free speech has limits? And don't forget that many free speech apologetics say that…

> According to your logic cyberbullying is just free speech. IMO it is > Should I wish for you to by cyberbullied, so you see first hand that free speech has limits? Feel free to, you have that right. If people choose to act on it I will deal with it on my end appropriately, and I wont be complaining to you to stop saying what you have the right to.

Post by chownie » Mon, Feb 17, 2025, 2:20 PM UTC

alt227 wrote: post #212

jgaa wrote: post #7

So much for Elons "Free Speech"! This may come as a shock to him: Free Speech means to allow people to say something that he disagree with. Something that may hurt his interests or even his ego. Free speech is not to allow people to say things he agree with or don't care about.

[flagged]