Earlier quoted context omitted.
Both are arched-based. CachyOS is not made by a fascist.
> Guy says he doesn't want peoples political beliefs barfed all over his project. HE'S A FASCIST.
Yeah that's not what he said.
Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
481–486 of 486 posts
Re: Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
#482Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Guy says he doesn't want peoples political beliefs barfed all over his project. HE'S A FASCIST.
Yeah that's not what he said.
CachyOS team has very openly pushed its politics and believes that parents should have the right to transition the gender of their children and if you disagree you get permanently banned from their forums.
DHH said he think that too many projects are spewing their politics all over their projects and its gross and they should focus on their code.
Re: Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
#483Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's a political statement disguised as a FOSS project (which itself is fine, all software is political). The funders are not funding the development of a Linux distro, they are co-signing the political statement.
> which itself is fine, all software is political I don't mean to get distracted from the topic at hand, but is that really true? If I create my own software stack for the TRMNL display I received as a gift because I think it's fun and interesting, is that a political statement? What politics does that involve? If someone makes a small Rust library that implements some days structure and a few hundred people find it…
> It's exhausting to go through life if you think every field is a battlefield.
This is really the whole conversation. 'Everything is political' is literally true (they mean downstream of politics, in some sense) but it's really only brought up habitually like this to create a political conflict. Everything is also downstream of water, but it doesn't give me the right to flood your house.
Re: Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
#484Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably so people can understand what the post is about and can skip the rage-bait?
How is my title a rage bait? The current submission title is terrible, "Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues" would be much closer.
I mean your article is pretty bad. You posted two promptly patched security vulnerabilities and then essentially just wrote the same thing over and over and over again about how it's a sign of the whole project without really building up a case showing consistent negligence.
Re: Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
#485Okay, but how cool is that this feature (hotkey to pass a video, that is open in the browser, to yt-dlp) exists and works out of the box? It's unfortunate, that it was developed in a weird, insecure way, but I think that the fact that it exists is very cool. I've heard about Omarchy long time ago, but didn't switch, because at some point in my life I started to prefer something that is rock solid and well supported (…
Not very? Why would a TOS-violating feature like this be included as a default feature of an OS?
It's really incredible how so many of the people that in one thread will talk about workers rights will also come out to bat for some tech company's TOS.
Whatever your worldview is it's definitely not about freedom over authoritarianism.
Re: Omarchy development practices lead to predictable security issues
#486Earlier quoted context omitted.
Yeah that's not what he said.
CachyOS team has very openly pushed its politics and believes that parents should have the right to transition the gender of their children and if you disagree you get permanently banned from their forums. DHH said he think that too many projects are spewing their politics all over their projects and its gross and they should focus on their code.
Ok, but he said a lot more than that too. In particular he published his own manifesto/communique about what he thinks about certain political questions.