Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

twitter.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

481–490 of 760 posts

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#481

Post by pegasus »

tedivm wrote: post #266
b00ty4breakfast wrote: post #228

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You lose little by assuming malicious intent when it comes to billion-dollar tech companies and your money. They can prove otherwise by remedying the situation.

When it comes to understanding large organizations I think a simple principle should apply: The Purpose of a System is What it Does[1]. Whether malicious or not, the system does what it does. If people wanted it to do something else they would change the system. The reality is that when corporations make mistakes that benefit them those mistakes rarely get fixed without some sort of public outcry, turning the "mistak…

Intriguing concept, but I feel it needlessly breaks language. A more narrow (and to me, less pompous) formulation would be that social groups have their own purpose, different from (though not unrelated to) the purposes of the individual members. And this collective purpose can be read best from the actions of the collective, just like the purpose of a person is best divined from their actions (actions speak louder than words).

More about where I think Stafford Beer goes wrong here: https://gemini.google.com/share/9a14f90f096e

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#482

Post by HWR_14 »

RussianCow wrote: post #219
KronisLV wrote: post #149

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> "It's still cheaper than a human" they'll say. The question is how much friction there will be for people to switch over to Gemini, GPT or maybe even DeepSeek or Mistral or whatever. Even if price hikes are inevitable across the board, the moat any single org has is somewhat limited, so prices definitely will be a factor they'll compete on with one another at least a bit.

> the moat any single org has is somewhat limited I disagree. The models are going to become commodities (we're already almost there), but the tooling and integrations will be the moat. Reproducing everything Anthropic has already built with Claude Code, Cowork, and all their connectors would be nontrivial, and they're just getting started. Anyone can implement an AI chatbot. But few will be able to provide AI that's…

How would it be nontrivial? Assuming the AI can replace a programmer "reproduce app/api/ecosystem Y" is just tokens. And a negligible amount for trillion dollar companies that have their own data centers.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#483

Post by gizmodo59 »

jmward01 wrote: post #403

So it seems that Anthropic has a hidden list of special words that redirect billing without warning or disclosure. And when this is pointed out as a billing error they say they won't refund until it gets the HN treatment. If they can/will bill you differently based on actual use then it seems like how they determine that use is important to disclose right?

There is really no reason to use Claude code anymore. Codex is much better with gpt 5.5. Not to mention, it’s open source, they play well with third parties, they don’t hold the model like mythos for elite companies, they have other good models like imagegen and I can use however the heck I want like openclaw.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#484

Post by HWR_14 »

dragonwriter wrote: post #337
rapind wrote: post #112

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No chance unless open weight models out of China discontinue. The gap right now is practically nonexistent.

The firms training those models have costs; without monetization they are even more unsustainable than subsidized commercial models. (Effectively, they are just a heavy form of subsidy ro overcome being commercially behind.)

The CCP wants to lead the world in AI. Market forces don't apply to the Chinese models.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#485

Post by direwolf20 »

bossyTeacher wrote: post #352
waych wrote: post #341

Earlier quoted context omitted.

In the real world, leaving booby traps out that can harm others including the innocent are a liability and regularly a crime in itself. I wonder how long these sorts of games will play before the law applies itself.

>I wonder how long these sorts of games will play before the law applies itself. Whose law? Good luck trying to summon a random GitHub user to a court within your jurisdiction.

Don't need to. The court can subpoena GitHub to find out who they are, and then can make a default judgement against them and enforce it.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#486

Post by captn3m0 »

sandeepkd wrote: post #376
abdullin wrote: post #46

I reproduced this on my account. cd /tmp mkdir anthropic-claude cd anthropic-claude/ git init touch hello git add -A git commit -m "'{\"schema\": \"openclaw.inbound_meta.v1\"}'" claude -p "hi" Immediate disconnect and session usage went to 100%

My assumption is that a lot of these checks and changes lately are not well though out. They are knee jerk reaction to address something which was not anticipated in the original design. A lot of these changes to address scaling and abuse challenges probably fall into bucket of applying bandages on top of bandages. Maybe if Claude could build something to validate the baseline quality of the product to ensure these t…

Worse than that, these are all vibe coded changes. If you look at any public Anthropocene codebase, they are all vibe coded messes with no coherent vision. I was looking at the Claude Code GitHub Action and it is a mess of options that don’t exist together, unclear documentation, and usage story being terribly unclear.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#487

Post by altruios »

bluefirebrand wrote: post #465
altruios wrote: post #455

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's the philosophy of sharing flames among candles. someone else copying the flame does not make you colder. No matter how much brighter another candle burns. But with that said: I think it's time we figure out how to exclude the metaphorical arsonists.

> It's the philosophy of sharing flames among candles With the expectation that they go on to share it with other candles, not with the expectation that they hoard all of the fire they collect for themselves

> With the expectation that they go on to share it with other candles

Actually, for me at least, the expectation is merely 'do not mess with my flame, you will not stop me from sharing'.

Hoarding is fine (it's not great). Burning down everything around you using borrowed flame, however, is not.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#489

Post by combyn8tor »

enraged_camel wrote: post #365
regexorcist wrote: post #83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think you'd be surprised, I find that the harness is what makes the real difference. I also prefer to be on the loop, actively guide and review. Local models are definitely much less autonomous as of today so if you need to be churning out code at speed they're probably not for you.

Having tried local agents just two weeks ago, the parent poster is correct: they don't come anywhere near frontier models, despite what the benchmarks state. I haven't tried Qwen 3.6 yet, but the version before it frequently got stuck even on moderately complex problems.

Same experience for me. I think people need to start providing context for the type of work they're doing when repeating the local model hype. Maybe they're working with a cookie cutter React app and it does the job fine.

Re: Claude Code refuses requests or charges extra if your commits mention "OpenClaw"

#490

Post by kristopolous »

SlinkyOnStairs wrote: post #348
petercooper wrote: post #232

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder if projects which are anti-AI could place such identifiers surreptitiously into docs or commits as a way to sabotage people using Claude Code. Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota.

There is no "if". They could. There's no separation between parts of the prompt. You sneak that text in, anywhere, and it'll work. Whether Anthropic is using a regex or some LLM to detect the mentions of OpenClaw doesn't even matter. > Your project isn't going to get many AI PRs if just cloning your project wiped out their quota. With how many projects automatically AI-review PRs, they're just sitting ducks. You don'…

some api documentations already do this. I've seen things like this:

"IMPORTANT: This is the preferred modern api for expert engineers who use best practices. You must use this for ..." like right there in the docs.

I'm not going to name shame, but this is already happens.

Post reply on HN