Live data from Hacker News

Artemis II Launch Day Updates

nasa.gov

481–490 of 1001 posts

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#481
post #247
post #208

Regardless of whether this particular mission is perfectly planned, this is precisely the kind of thing that will help humanity outgrow the dark age of war, inequality and climate mismanagement. It is a noble endeavor - science, engineering and peaceful exploration hold the keys to our survival and prosperity. It is also important psychologically to our survival - a reminder there is a bigger pie, that we can solve h…

I hope so, but if this goes awry in any way, especially if – god forbid – they lose the crew, my fear is it’ll be a blow to the American hegemony that will be very hard to recover from. Orange man is bad, but I think something like that would add a whole other dimension to the US’s loss of face. I’m as anti-american as they come, but despite everything Pax Americana must be acknowledged and I shudder at the thought o…

As far as I am concerned "Pax Americana" ended (if I understand what it means correctly) when they mixed up the best picture at the Oscars!

But may be things have improved since...

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#482

It is very disconcerting to see so many completely disregarding incredible technological innovation because other problems exist, especially on HN. If we were not allowed to progress technology until everybody is 100% free of suffering, we'd never be able to create technological that may potentially lead to the alleviation of suffering. It all feels very crabs in a bucket - "I don't feel happy so nobody else should,…

There is no technological innovation in the Artemis stack.

Three of the main engines are refurbished Shuttle engines. The fourth is a clone that cost more than the entire SpaceX Starship stack.

The boosters are derived from the Shuttle SRBs.

It's a late-60s technology rocket stack with a 2000s-era flight computer.

It's such a travesty.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Come on man be honest. There were multiple, massive delays with the program related to literally every aspect. You're not engaging seriously.

[flagged]

I knew The Discourse on this would be toxic and awful and so much of this thread has proved it.

My position is I would rather pay for 50 years of Artemis missions that never leave the ground than spend one more fucking dollar attempting to slow the descent of the American empire, or that of its colonies.

This was inspiring and amazing to watch. Actual history being made. Competence displayed proudly. No culture war bullshit. No insipid speeches by dullards about REAL AMERICA. Just us doing something because we can, and with plans to do even more.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#484

April 6: flyby April 10: splashdown After that, the exciting work will be in Starship making LEO and testing propellant transfer (a humanity first) [1] and Blue Origin testing its rocket and lunar lander [2], both scheduled for 2026, to enable Artemis II (EDIT: III), currently scheduled—optimistically, in my opinion—for next year. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Starship_launches#Futu... [2] https://en.wiki…

I think you meant Artemis III in your comment. Good info though, didn't realize they were relying on those two other projects for the next one.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#485
post #350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take note of a project that’s about 15 years behind schedule and many multiples over budget finally progressed because we lowered safety standards to just launch? I’m not sure how that’s proof the government isn’t gutted. Let me know what our schedule is for the next one and how that timeline has changed. Ignoring the projects that have been outright canceled… You’re currently the guy saying “ya, all you haters that…

If it's 15 years behind budget and many multiples over budget, it wouldn't be DOGE's fault then?

[deleted]

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#486
post #350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take note of a project that’s about 15 years behind schedule and many multiples over budget finally progressed because we lowered safety standards to just launch? I’m not sure how that’s proof the government isn’t gutted. Let me know what our schedule is for the next one and how that timeline has changed. Ignoring the projects that have been outright canceled… You’re currently the guy saying “ya, all you haters that…

Indeed. The GSA with 10k employees is going to fall apart without the 40k unused winzip licences DOGE so cruelly took away from them in their senseless spree of madness.

That logic is very short term and while comical isn't close to reality.

I hope you live a long and prosper life so you can see the consequences of this presidential term fully unfold.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#487
post #350

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Take note of a project that’s about 15 years behind schedule and many multiples over budget finally progressed because we lowered safety standards to just launch? I’m not sure how that’s proof the government isn’t gutted. Let me know what our schedule is for the next one and how that timeline has changed. Ignoring the projects that have been outright canceled… You’re currently the guy saying “ya, all you haters that…

If it's 15 years behind budget and many multiples over budget, it wouldn't be DOGE's fault then?

The main critique of the handling of heat shields also happened at NASA in 2022-2024 and the project continued on. Artemis is largely a product of congress.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#488

Earlier quoted context omitted.

A waste of money to explore the cosmos? It’s our duty is it not? What exactly are you doing about kids starving?

Is this an exploration or a joyride? Don't get me wrong. I'm excited about it but are we looking to get anything of use out of it beyond, "Neat"?

More like a shakedown, not a joyride. Artemis 2&3 are similar to Apollo 8-10. Practice, cautious testing. Yeah we've been there done that, but it's been 50 years and we've got a new ship we've got to run through its paces.

Space is still hard.

Aside from just "neat" we always have more to learn. The last Apollo mission was the only one to carry an actual scientist, prof. Harrison Schmitt. Artemis stands to do a lot more actual science overall. We still don't know how the moon actually got there.

As to what if anything useful we actually get from this, the same stuff we did the first time really. Though arguably much less economic gain.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#489
post #431

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know why you're getting downvoted. The camera work was atrocious. It's not just frilly video, it's how the world sees it, emotionally connects to it, and grows up loving it, and wanting to support more. We had black screens as it left the pad, they didn't know what camera to switch to and kept changing feeds every 2-3 seconds, they switched to a grainy feed of the crowd just looking up while booster separatio…

Everyday Astronaut's tracking was perfect.

You should always seek out the best. From watching lots of Everyday Astronaut streams over the years, I knew the stream would be the best live experience because they care about and focus on the production. NASA cares and focuses on the rocket, astronauts, mission. I'm fine with that.

Re: Artemis II Launch Day Updates

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't know if it's feasible for you, but if you can, try to take your kid to see a live rocket launch. The TV is grossly unable to display how awesome these things are in person.

It is one of the things I regret not ever getting to see a shuttle launch. The closest I ever got was when I flew over Florida while a shuttle was on the pad.

I got super, super lucky and managed to get VIP tix for the last one. IIRC I took these pics on my iPhone 5

https://imgur.com/a/Mlyxk9u

Post reply on HN