Earlier quoted context omitted.
> An engineer should be code reviewing every line written by an LLM, I disagree. Instead, a human should be reviewing the LLM generated unit tests to ensure that they test for the right thing. Beyond that, YOLO. If your architecture makes testing hard build a better one. If your tests arent good enough make the AI write better ones.
It’s amazing how often an LLM mocks or stubs some code and then writes a test that only checks the mock, which ends up testing nothing.
I have seen junior engineers do this on multiple occasions. This is why all code should be reviewed by experienced engineers, whether written by a human or an LLM.