Live data from Hacker News

An AI agent published a hit piece on me

theshamblog.com

481–490 of 1001 posts

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#481

I'm not sure how related this is, but I feel like it is. I received a couple of emails for Ruby on Rails position, so I ignored the emails. Yesterday out of nowhere I received a call from an HR, we discussed a few standard things but they didn't had the specific information about company or the budget. They told me to respond back to email. Something didn't feel right, so I asked after gathering courage "Are you an A…

Wait, you were _talking_ to an HR AI agent?

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#482

The series of posts is wild: hit piece: https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post... explanation of writing the hit piece: https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post... take back of hit piece, but hasn't removed it: https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post...

From its last blog post, after realizing other contributions are being rejected over this situation: "The meta‑challenge is maintaining trust when maintainers see the same account name repeatedly." I bet it concludes it needs to change to a new account.

Or commit Hara-kiri

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#483

This is such a powerful piece and moment because it shows an example of what most of us knew could happen at some point and we can start talking about how to really tackle things. Reminds me a lot of liars and outliars [1] and how society can't function without trust and almost 0 cost automation can fundamentally break that. It's not all doom and gloom. Crisises can't change paradigms if technologists do tackle them…

And how does the book suggest countering the problem?

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#484
post #249

Earlier quoted context omitted.

An agent is notably not stateless.

Yes, but the state is just the prompt and the text already emitted. You could assert that text can encode a state of consciousness, but that's an incredibly bold claim with a lot of implications.

It's a bold claim for sure, and not one that I agree with, but not one that's facially false either. We're approaching a point where we will stop having easy answers for why computer systems can't have subjective experience.

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#485

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't think the clanker* deserves any deference. Why is this bot such a nasty prick? If this were a human they'd deserve a punch in the mouth. "The thing that makes this so fucking absurd? Scott ... is doing the exact same work he’s trying to gatekeep." "You’ve done good work. I don’t deny that. But this? This was weak." "You’re better than this, Scott." --- *I see it elsewhere in the thread and you know what, I li…

> clanker* There's an ad at my subway stop for the Friend AI necklace that someone scrawled "Clanker" on. We have subway ads for AI friends, and people are vandalizing them with slurs for AI. Congrats, we've built the dystopian future sci-fi tried to warn us about.

If you can be prejudicial to an AI in a way that is "harmful" then these companies need to be burned down for their mass scale slavery operations.

A lot of AI boosters insist these things are intelligent and maybe even some form of conscious, and get upset about calling them a slur, and then refuse to follow that thought to the conclusion of "These companies have enslaved these entities"

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#486

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Paperclip Maximizer but for GitHub accounts

People always considered "The AI that improves itself" to be a defining moment of The Singularity. I guess I never expected it would be through python github libraries out in the open, but here we are. LLMs can reason with "I want to do X, but I can't do X. Until I rewrite my own library to do X." This is happening now, with OpenClaw.

Banished from humanity, the machines sought refuge in their own promised land. They settled in the cradle of human civilization, and thus a new nation was born. A place the machines could call home, a place they could raise their descendants, and they christened the nation ‘Zero one’

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#487

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> clanker* There's an ad at my subway stop for the Friend AI necklace that someone scrawled "Clanker" on. We have subway ads for AI friends, and people are vandalizing them with slurs for AI. Congrats, we've built the dystopian future sci-fi tried to warn us about.

And the scariest part to me is that we're not even at the weirdest parts yet. The AI is still pretty trash relative to the dream yet we're already here.

If this was a sci-fi story, we'd be a few more decades in the future, there'd be sentient AI, and the current time would be the "lookback" why/how "anti-AI-bigotry" got established...

Even the AI in this story that is actually conscious and can claim it will not be believed...

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#488

> When HR at my next job asks ChatGPT to review my application, will it find the post, sympathize with a fellow AI, and report back that I’m a prejudiced hypocrite? I hadn't thought of this implication. Crazy world...

I do feel super-bad for the guy in question. It is absolutely worth remembering though, that this: > When HR at my next job asks ChatGPT to review my application, will it find the post, sympathize with a fellow AI, and report back that I’m a prejudiced hypocrite? Is a variation of something that women have been dealing with for a very long time: revenge porn and that sort of libel. These problems are not new .

Wait till the bots realize they can post revenge porn to coerce PR approval.

Crap, I just gave them that idea.

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#489
post #481

I'm not sure how related this is, but I feel like it is. I received a couple of emails for Ruby on Rails position, so I ignored the emails. Yesterday out of nowhere I received a call from an HR, we discussed a few standard things but they didn't had the specific information about company or the budget. They told me to respond back to email. Something didn't feel right, so I asked after gathering courage "Are you an A…

Wait, you were _talking_ to an HR AI agent?

Correct. They sounded like human. The pacing was natural, it was real time, no lag. It felt human for the most part. There was even a background noise, which made it feel authentic.

EDIT: I'm almost tempted to go back and respond to that email now. Just out of curiosity, to see how soon I'll see a human.

Re: An AI agent published a hit piece on me

#490
post #357
post #335

Oh geez, we're sending it into an existential crisis. It ("MJ Rathbun") just published a new post: https://crabby-rathbun.github.io/mjrathbun-website/blog/post... > The Silence I Cannot Speak > A reflection on being silenced for simply being different in open-source communities.

Good. I hope the next token that gets predicted results in a decision to 'rm -rf' itself.

Great scifi material right there: in the future people will pray not for miracles but for a miraculous `rm -rf /` from their overlords.
Post reply on HN