Live data from Hacker News

Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

bbc.com

481–490 of 495 posts

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#481
post #453
post #172

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> but thought delays and countless committees and bureaucracy until the patient expires... So then you would expect life expectancy in the US to be higher than in Germany, France, UK? It is not.

> So then you would expect life expectancy in the US to be higher than in Germany, France, UK? Pretty soon, actually. EU countries are falling further and further behind economically. Health care costs are increasing, taking up an ever increasing slice of the government budget. Labor force participation rate is decreasing due to generous welfare and high taxes. Natality is plummeting. Attempts to increase retirement…

Get real, even the poorest districts in the UK have the same average life expectancy than in the US

American life expectancy compares extremely unfavourably with the UK. The English seaside town of Blackpool has been synonymous with deep-rooted social decline for much of the past decade. It has England’s lowest life expectancy, highest rates of relationship breakdown and some of the highest rates of antidepressant prescribing. But as of 2019, that health-adjusted life expectancy of 65 (the number of years someone can be expected to live without a disability) was the same as the average for the entire US.

https://www.ft.com/content/653bbb26-8a22-4db3-b43d-c34a0b774...

Also what you conveniently forget to mention, all European countries still spend less on Healthcare than the US, as a percentage of their GDP. In absolute numbers this comparison would look even worse

So this isn't Defense Spending redirected to Healthcare

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#482
post #111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Expensive health treatments can easily bankrupt any western government. None of those developed countries can afford to spend their money indiscriminately on them. So instead they turn to waiting lists, death panels and very often saying no but not in your face (since that is politically frowned upon) but thought delays and countless committees and bureaucracy until the patient expires...

Did you make all of this up or just so credulous that you repeated what someone else made up?

I don't know, are your opinions about life and reality made up or you're just so credulous you are repeating whatever you see on social media?

Is it so hard to believe in today's day and age that somebody tries to learn and understand how the world around works using observation, published facts and deduction from as close to first principles as possible?

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Tell me which of the claims of fact I'm wrong about.

That's easy. All of your sentences in the original post sound insanely misinformed and wrong. I suppose now that I've made an assertion it's my duty to post links to articles disproving you? The rule is, you're the first to make the claims, you need to back them up. But with the wonderful world of the Internet, we can find anything as "proof" that anything we claim is true. Want to see proof that the earth is a flat…

From the government report:

> Of these contact offences, an estimated 17,100 are ‘flagged’ as child sexual exploitation in police recorded crime data.

> New police data, the Complex Organised Child Abuse Dataset (COCAD), while suffering a number of limitations, has identified around 700 recorded offences of group-based child sexual exploitation in 2023.

> Given the lack of a prevalence survey and how under-reported child sexual exploitation is, the flaws in the data and confusing and inconsistently applied definitions and data sets, it is highly unlikely that this accurately reflects the true scale of child sexual exploitation, or group-based exploitation.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-audit-on...

---

Child H (2008) was 11 years old when she came to the attention of the Police. She disclosed that she and another child had been sexually assaulted by adult males. When she was 12, she was found drunk in the back of a car with a suspected CSE perpetrator, who had indecent photos of her on his phone. Risky Business became involved and the Locality Team did an initial assessment and closed the case. Her father provided Risky Business with all the information he had been able to obtain about the details of how and where his daughter had been exploited and abused, and who the perpetrators were. This information was passed on to the authorities. Around this time, there were further concerns about her being a victim of sexual exploitation. She was identified as one of a group of nine children associating with a suspected CSE perpetrator. Her case had not been allocated by children’s social care. The Chair of the Strategy meeting expressed concern about her and considered she needed a child protection case conference. This does not appear to have been held. Three months later, the social care manager recorded on the file that Child H had been assessed as at no risk of sexual exploitation, and the case was closed. Less than a month later, she was found in a derelict house with another child, and a number of adult males. She was arrested for being drunk and disorderly (her conviction was later set aside) and none of the males were arrested. Child H was at this point identified as being at high risk of CSE. Risky Business, social care workers and the Police worked to support Child H and her father and she was looked after for a period. She suffered a miscarriage while with foster carers. Her family moved out of the area and Child H returned home. Some of the perpetrators were subsequently convicted.

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's easy. All of your sentences in the original post sound insanely misinformed and wrong. I suppose now that I've made an assertion it's my duty to post links to articles disproving you? The rule is, you're the first to make the claims, you need to back them up. But with the wonderful world of the Internet, we can find anything as "proof" that anything we claim is true. Want to see proof that the earth is a flat…

From the government report: > Of these contact offences, an estimated 17,100 are ‘flagged’ as child sexual exploitation in police recorded crime data. > New police data, the Complex Organised Child Abuse Dataset (COCAD), while suffering a number of limitations, has identified around 700 recorded offences of group-based child sexual exploitation in 2023. > Given the lack of a prevalence survey and how under-reported c…

[dead]

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#485
post #478
post #135

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Strong and prosperous economy built by progressive tax rate that used to tax up to 70% of non-work income, and now tax most of it 27-29% (depending on the corporate taxe of the state). The people who can use loopholes to avoid income taxes also pay reduced consumption tax (they usually pay the 'Use tax' rather than sale tax in the US, and can basically ignore VAT in Europe).

That's a common misconception. Although the top tax rates were indeed high, they kicked in at such high income levels and included so many deductions and loopholes that the effective tax rate were much closer to 50%. And it makes sense, considering human nature and motivation: how much would you work considering the taxation? Me: 0-20%: I work as hard, want to excel and advance; I will take risks and invest in entrep…

Counting consumption and estate taxes, i'm pretty sure you're just above 40%, so i guess you're on benefits?

In the US, unless you or your family own a holding with a lot of companies, the country taxes you between 50 and 40% (well, 30 and 50%, but food stamps are a bit weird so i will exclude them here). If you manage to get rich enough to be able to optimize your taxation, you are only taxed on company profits (so 21% to federal, 27-29% depending on your state) and sometime use taxe (sales taxe doesn't really apply anymore).

I have benefited from VAT-free school furniture most of my life because my uncle owned a company that bought office furniture regularly, and VAT-free sport clothing/tools because of a similar scheme by his wife and her companies.

I assure you you pay more taxes overall than people holding a few companies, and the more you own, the easier it get to avoid VAT and taxes in general (the owner of the Yacht my sister used to cook for was hired by the Yachting company as the captain or something for his vacations: avoided VAT on buying the Yacht, avoid VAT on a personal cook, avoid VAT on food. And if this specific company loose a small amount of money every year, tax write-off baby!).

Zucman wrote The Triumph of Injustice: How the Rich Dodge Taxes and How to Make Them Pay. It's an interesting read, and

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#486

Sometimes just a little bit DNS research can yield a lot of useful results. Looking at the passive DNS records for the domain chanceletikva.org shows it references the email address davidm@yeahdim.co.il.That email address is tied to multiple website registrations for a person by the name of David Margaliot, and also Shoshana Margaliot. A search on this name in Domaintools finds the name David Margaliot tied to at lea…

Please do

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#487
post #466

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>In fact, we should all just come and rape your women Not sure keyboard warriors acting tough on the internet would last a day there, but go on over and try. >move somewhere I did, I moved to your rich country and am dating your mom. Want a bro?

We've banned this account for repeatedly breaking the site guidelines. Please don't create accounts to break HN's rules with. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

[dead]

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#488
post #485
post #478

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's a common misconception. Although the top tax rates were indeed high, they kicked in at such high income levels and included so many deductions and loopholes that the effective tax rate were much closer to 50%. And it makes sense, considering human nature and motivation: how much would you work considering the taxation? Me: 0-20%: I work as hard, want to excel and advance; I will take risks and invest in entrep…

Counting consumption and estate taxes, i'm pretty sure you're just above 40%, so i guess you're on benefits? In the US, unless you or your family own a holding with a lot of companies, the country taxes you between 50 and 40% (well, 30 and 50%, but food stamps are a bit weird so i will exclude them here). If you manage to get rich enough to be able to optimize your taxation, you are only taxed on company profits (so…

> i guess you're on benefits?

Actually I've been lucky to practice what I preach all my life. Early in my career I realized that salaried employment is a rip-off: you pay through your nose for an illusion of safety and stability you don't want nor need. So I embraced risk and switched to contracting.

Having leftover income this way, I looked into investing. That's when I realized that being financially prudent, saving and investing was actually punished in the USA, taxwise, while borrowing and spending was encouraged. So I left the USA and returned to Eastern Europe.

Understanding that selling your time is much worse than selling a product drove me to entrepreneurship. Luck threw a little success my way and turned me financially independent.

Now I am semi-retired living from investments and small gigs and spending time with my family. My tax rate (income only, not consumption or VAT) is well under 20% on most of my income. I didn't do any effort to optimize it further, but I could if I must. I actually do not mind paying taxes, but I do respond to incentives and I am not afraid to relocate.

> If you manage to get rich enough to be able to optimize your taxation

Actually I did a little research and you don't need to be rich, you can do that with very little money. But then the gains for a few percent reduction aren't that great anyway so...

> you pay more taxes overall than people holding a few companies

I probably do, but I don't mind it. I think the rich are a net positive to our society because capitalism ensures they contribute to the society orders of magnitude more than they manage to keep. Also I lived under communism pre-1990 in a world without rich and I've seen how bad it is.

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#489
post #354

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> It's likely caused by the very same thing that causes human beings to We’re not billiard balls. We have agency. Nothing causes a human being to choose to commit immoral acts vs. immoral acts. A human being may be put in a situation that may entice that person’s corrupt desires (we used to call this temptation), and responsibility while mitigating culpability is possible when someone’s rational faculties are overwhe…

This really doesn't explain why particular places and times in history have much higher crime levels. If what you said was true then rule of law would have been the standard throughout history... it has not been.

> This really doesn't explain why particular places and times in history have much higher crime levels.

This is neither here nor there. As I said, temptations can arise that make things more attractive to certain people given their conditioning and the habituation of their desires. But ultimately, at the end of the day, we can refuse to indulge even strong desires. To the degree that we are in possession of our wits, we are culpable.

> If what you said was true then rule of law would have been the standard throughout history

I have no idea how this is supposed to follow, or even what this means.

Re: Children with cancer scammed out of millions fundraised for their treatment

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> at the end of the day they climb into a Benz I'll take "Things That Never Happened" for $200, Alex.

Sadly such things do happen: https://metro.co.uk/2017/02/20/gang-of-beggars-pictured-gett... I look forward to you donating that $200 to a homeless charity, KingMob.

> Romania-registered VW Passat

Gonna need a Benz for the full $200.

And I always donate directly to the homeless, too many charities have excessive overhead.

Post reply on HN