Live data from Hacker News

Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

kensegall.com

481–490 of 519 posts

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Usenet. Right and this is less obscure and more easier to use than Amazon, Spotify, and Netflix? Give me a break.

Setup is tricky first time and permissions can be a horror, but after that it’s ‘Rrs doing it all. Sonarr, Radarr etc. it’s all automated and if you use lists you don’t actually touch it unless adding a new series, it just works.

Same with paying for your software. One time setup and it just works afterwards, but easier.

I use stremio with pirate plugins which provides basically an identical experience to Netflix. Don’t even need a setup.

I think you get it though. You use Usenet because you don’t want to pay right? Pure and simple.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#482
post #395

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Different indeed, like that time Jobs pushed U2 album into every iphone.

Steve Jobs died in 2011, that "Songs of Innocence" fiasco was in 2014.

You are right, I misremembered U2 branded iPod as that song debacle.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#483
post #112

Sadly iPhone sales and revenue saturated like 4 years ago (and the same for Mac, Wearables and iPad [0]). They focus now a lot on growing revenue from services. Which is kind of sad because they have still much room to grow Mac and iPad: - just make iPad more useful and support MacOS - it's not gonna canibalize Mac, they sale each year 2x more iPads than Macs and 12x more iPhones than Macs. - make macbook Pro standar…

They don't put MacOS on iPad because they want MacOS to slowly die and make App Store the only way to install software. This has nothing to do with cannibalizing Mac.

It’s astonishing to me that even so many long-term Apple observers don’t see this, even though they are sorta obvious about it. “Now that the hardware is so close, the systems converge, etc., there is really no reason iPad will not eventually run macOS” – No, macOS will continue to be dumbed and locked down (“security!!11”) until the point where the Macs can be safely switched over from the terribly open legacy OS.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#484

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it does not. Give some real arguments against the article otherwise I'm going to assume bad faith.

While it may not be totally sensible, using AI imagery to depict something that never happened definitely does decrease trust. The exact same effect can be seen happening in sports as they added gambling on top. People are losing faith that the truth hasn’t been manipulated because there is ample opportunity to break trust and insert fiction.

What decreases trust is taking something innocent and blowing it out of proportion, then using it to attack people.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#485

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I disagree. Apple had no monopoly on 1.8" hard drives nor most of the other components in the original iPod (except maybe the scroll wheel itself?); they were merely among the first to apply it into a media player. It was the UI that was groundbreaking. You could switch from an album, to and artist, to a playlist, to a specific song all within seconds with your thumb. CD-based mp3 players were ok, but were battery ho…

The first Apple iPods only had FireWire which was exotic here, so they were not at all popular. I had a Rio (Nitrus, I think?) that was released within a year from iPod's release. When I first interacted with an iPod a couple of years later, I was not at all impressed. I didn't have a NOMAD, but Slashdot's "no wireless, less space than a NOMAD, lame" tagline was pretty much on point. Its marketing was great, however.

"No wireless, less space than a nomad, but can be fully synced up and fast-charged in a few minutes" is what the review should have been. USB support came after when usb2 was "good enough". Syncing and creating playlists with other players was usually awful, slow, and the bundled software was not much better. iTunes was (at least at the time before the iTunes Store) quite lean and mean, too.

I'm not saying the iPod was perfect, though later versions got pretty close. But the "no wireless" part of the review still makes me chuckle. There were few hand-held anything that leveraged it at any truly useful level until proper smartphones existed.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#486

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Digital removes the broken glass. The broken glass and the physical object are the actual difference in that case. The book store is paying for the glass and the unit cost of printing the hardcover. You've diverged from criticizing rationalization of not paying to accusing someone who actually paid of doing something wrong. Now who is rationalizing the double dipping and copyrights that last so excessively long the…

Oh simple. Remove the glass and I pick the lock of the front door to your home and walk in at night while you, your wife and your kids are fast asleep and I scan the book that I want with a portable scanner. Not just one book. Many book across many nights. No damage done right? Once your wife and you find out that that’s all I’m doing you guys are totally ok with this. > Which isn't a sufficient explanation if it doe…

> Oh simple. Remove the glass and I pick the lock of the front door to your home and walk in at night while you, your wife and your kids are fast asleep and I scan the book that I want with a portable scanner. Not just one book. Many book across many nights. No damage done right? Once your wife and you find out that that’s all I’m doing you guys are totally ok with this.

So now you want to replace the things that aren't happening in the digital case with some other things that aren't happening in the digital case?

Your analogy is barely even an analogy. It's pretty obvious what the physical equivalent would be. You'd make a copy of the paperback as a hardcover, yourself in your own place with your own materials. Which doesn't seem nearly as objectionable as breaking into a bookstore or a house or stealing a physical object with a unit cost, because it isn't.

> What causes people to not steal other than good will? What causes people to not kill other than altruism. The government and society has several methods for this. Jail time? Locks? Etc. It’s just hard to do the same for piracy.

Which is why it would make a lot of sense for the companies selling this stuff to care about and do everything they can to retain that good will, right?

> The topic is about the less obvious thing and why people like you go to elaborate lengths to side step admitting that you’re a fucking thief.

Were the people saying they were returning to piracy not admitting they were returning to piracy, or were they just explaining what it would take to make them not?

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#487
post #75

> From that point on, Steve would go on to spend lavishly on things that improved the experience, and he would reject—often brutally—any idea that diluted or harmed the experience. ...I’ll go out on a limb and say that uninvited advertising is not normally equated with a better customer experience. YES!!! SOO much of the Apple user experience has degraded due to this. I can't listen to my own music that I bought on t…

I was gifted an iPad for Christmas a few years back and quickly found out there's nothing you can do on it without either looking at ads or paying a subscription. I returned it before the factory battery charge ran out.

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#488

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There are two major classes of pirates. The first is people who don't have the money, e.g. students. They will never pay you; they don't have the money. The second is people who do have the money but value the experience above other things. These would be your best customers, if you provide the better experience. If you don't provide the better experience, they don't pay. Is that a rationalization? Maybe, but are you…

Let us be clear from the start. This thread is not about piracy. Everyone pirates. Everyone knows everyone pirates. The internet is a vast floating marketplace of digital oranges stolen from the same tree. The practical question is boring. The interesting question is psychological. How do you, personally, live with yourself while doing it? Why do people in this thread need to build entire theological systems of justi…

Found the redditor

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#489

Earlier quoted context omitted.

To be fair — and I love my Mac — macOS isn’t as snappy as Linux in my experience. And yet I still rock macOS because it just works and slow app load times are just a small price to pay for things just working. YMMV of course.

> MacOS [....] it just works and slow app load times are just a small price to pay for things just working. Oxymoron?

No. Just fire up apps once and reuse them. Zed stays open all day. Rio stays open all day. As does chrome. Launch once he amortize the overhead over the whole day. Boom.

The same approach that’s Mitchell suggests with Ghostty

Re: Apple is crossing a Steve Jobs red line

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Digital removes the broken glass. The broken glass and the physical object are the actual difference in that case. The book store is paying for the glass and the unit cost of printing the hardcover. You've diverged from criticizing rationalization of not paying to accusing someone who actually paid of doing something wrong. Now who is rationalizing the double dipping and copyrights that last so excessively long the…

Oh simple. Remove the glass and I pick the lock of the front door to your home and walk in at night while you, your wife and your kids are fast asleep and I scan the book that I want with a portable scanner. Not just one book. Many book across many nights. No damage done right? Once your wife and you find out that that’s all I’m doing you guys are totally ok with this. > Which isn't a sufficient explanation if it doe…

Are you okay mate? Frankly your comments are absolutely unhinged. And that's not a value judgement, that's an observation.
Post reply on HN