Live data from Hacker News

ChatGPT Pulse

openai.com

481–490 of 766 posts

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#481

What problem does this solve. The silence is better. Reminds me of recommend engines in general. Or ads. Bothering my cognition with stuff I have to ignore.

Yeah, this is just an algorithmic feed - or, at least, the first attempts. After a while you'll stop asking questions yourself and just scroll the feed, just like you do on every other platform.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#482
post #233

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Argue with it. Criticize it. Nitpick the questions it asked. Tell it what you just said: you just gave me a generic summary of the top 5 articles you'd get if you googled "how to fix depression, social anxiety" or something When you open the prompt the first time it has zero context on you . I'm not an LLM-utopist, but just like with a human therapist you need to give it more context. Even arguing with it is context.

I do, frequently, and ChatGPT in particular gets stuck in a loop where it specifically ignores whatever I write and repeats the same thing over and over again. To give a basic example, ask it to list some things and then ask it to provide more examples. It's gonna be immediately stuck in a loop and repeat the same thing over and over again. Maybe one of the 10 examples it gives you is different, but that's gonna be a…

I would recommend talking out loud to it with speech to text software, it has been pretty helpful for me. Like around 60s of talking.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#483
post #160

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Plenty of people open Reels or Tiktok the second they wake up. Mobile means notifications, and of you see one as soon as you turn off the alarm, you're more likely to open the app.

Do I have a problem if HN is the first thing I open?

Is it a conscious decision and not a habit, automatism or compulsion? Then it might not be a problem but I would still recommend to start the day with just yourself. Any outside influence is that - influence - and will alter your whole day. Do you really need it or could you let your mind wander instead?

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#484
post #238

LLMs are increasingly part of intimate conversations. That proximity lets them learn how to manipulate minds. We must stop treating humans as uniquely mysterious. An unfettered market for attention and persuasion will encourage people to willingly harm their own mental lives. Think social medias are bad now? Children exposed to personalized LLMs will grow up inside many tiny, tailored realities. In a decade we may me…

It doesn't have to be that way of course. You could envision an LLM whose "paperclip" is coaching you to become a great "xyz". Record every minute of your day, including your conversations. Feed it to the LLM. It gives feedback on what you did wrong, refuses to be your social outlet, and demands you demonstrate learning in the next day before it rewards with more attention. Basically, a fanatically devoted life coach…

That sounds like a very optimistic/naive view on what LLMs and "the market" can achieve. First, the models are limited in their skills: they're as wide as a sea, and as shallow as a puddle. There's no way it can coach you to whatever goal (aside: who picks that goal? Is it a good goal to begin with?) since there's no training data for that. The model will just rehash something that vaguely looks like a response to your data, and after a while will end up in a steady state, unless you push it out of there.

Second, "the market" has never shown any tendency towards rewarding such a thing. The LLMs' development is driven by bonuses and stock prices, which is driven by how well the company can project FOMO and get people addicted to their products. This may well be a local optimum, but it will stay there, because the path towards your goal (which may not be a global optimum either) goes through loss, and that is very much against the culture of VCs and C suite.

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#485
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

AI SYSTEM perfect size for put data in to secure! inside very secure and useful data will be useful put data in AI System. Put data in AI System. no problems ever in AI Syste because good Shape and Support for data integration weak of big data. AI system yes a place for a data put data in AI System can trust Sam Altman for giveing good love to data. friend AI. [0] 0 - https://www.tumblr.com/elodieunderglass/186312312…

Nothing bad can happen, it can only good happen!

Perfect use of that line lol

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#486
post #66

My pulse today is just a mediocre rehash of prior conversations I’ve had on the platform. I tried to ask GPT-5 pro the other day to just pick an ambitious project it wanted to work on, and I’d carry out whatever physical world tasks it needed me to, and all it did was just come up with project plans which were rehashes of my prior projects framed as its own. I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels…

> I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels like blockchain again in a lot of weird ways. It doesn't feel like blockchain at all. Blockchain is probably the most useless technology ever invented (unless you're a criminal or an influencer who makes ungodly amounts of money off of suckers). AI is a powerful tool for those who are willing to put in the work. People who have the time, knowledge and crit…

How did you measure this skyrocketed productivity? Please share your results and methodology!

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#488
post #66

My pulse today is just a mediocre rehash of prior conversations I’ve had on the platform. I tried to ask GPT-5 pro the other day to just pick an ambitious project it wanted to work on, and I’d carry out whatever physical world tasks it needed me to, and all it did was just come up with project plans which were rehashes of my prior projects framed as its own. I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels…

> I’m rapidly losing interest in all of these tools. It feels like blockchain again in a lot of weird ways. It doesn't feel like blockchain at all. Blockchain is probably the most useless technology ever invented (unless you're a criminal or an influencer who makes ungodly amounts of money off of suckers). AI is a powerful tool for those who are willing to put in the work. People who have the time, knowledge and crit…

> It doesn't feel like blockchain at all. Blockchain is probably the most useless technology ever invented (unless you're a criminal or an influencer who makes ungodly amounts of money off of suckers).

Given the prevailing trend of virtually all modern governments in the developed world that seems to be rather short-sighted. Who knows, if you won't be made a criminal for dissenting? Or for trying to keep your communication private?

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#489
post #409

Earlier quoted context omitted.

GPT-4 got me seriously considering making a product for school-age kids w/ ADHD. It’d be a physical device (like a StarTrek communicator). That listens during your day and keeps track of a) things you say that you’ll do or b) tasks that other people ask you to do. Then it compiles those tasks and attempts to be basically a secretary. It can also plug into your email, texts & school assignments. The privacy implicatio…

Sure, the implications are horrifying, but tech companies have proven themselves quite trustworthy over the past few decades, so I'm sure it'd be fine. As someone with ADHD, I say: Please don't build this.

Look, the Torment Nexus has great potential, okay? The investors love it!

Re: ChatGPT Pulse

#490

Earlier quoted context omitted.

No it's not. It's existed for a thousand years in Asia through the hawala system. I mean, you need an intermediary. But with blockchain your intermediary is the exchange, the developers of the cryptocurrency, etc.

>with blockchain your intermediary is the exchange, the developers of the cryptocurrency, etc. You are mistaken. The transfer of cryptocurrencies takes place on the blockchain ledger. That's, like, the core "thing". If you choose to bank with an exchange, that's like you bringing your cash money to a regular bank and depositing it. And the developers are no more intermediaries to your transaction than the Mint is an…

I'm not mistaken. For an average person, they need to:

1. Understand how to use the technology and onboard onto it. In this case the technology is whichever blockchain and cryptocurrency.

2. Convert their money into the cryptocurrency. For this they need an exchange.

Then they can send money to others who also went through those steps.

Thus, there must be some kind of interaction with documentation made by devs for step 1 and a transfer of currency to an exchange for step 2. 2 middlemen/intermediaries.

Post reply on HN