Earlier quoted context omitted.
The example might be bad but the argument still stands. Painting hasn't disappeared when photography was invented. Drummers still drum after the invention of drum machines.
Music is actually a terrific counterexample to your point. It perfectly demonstrates the culturally and artistically destructive power of the steady march of progress in computer technology -- which really has led to fewer drummers. Far fewer people make their living as musicians than did even thirty years ago, and being a musician is no longer a viable middle-class career. Jaron Lanier, who has written on this, has…
What he is comparing was a brief time in history that the music industry was at the absolute peak.
We have just gone back to normal that most people can't make money being a musician just like being an actor is not really a viable middle class career option.
Sure, when I graduated high school you could have just made a living in a local rock band because everyone wanted to be in a band to be the next Guns n Roses.
To me, it is like how even Hitler wanted to be a painter because everyone wanted to be a painter at that time. The way everyone wanted to be a rock star when i was a teenager.
Times change and the collective artistic taste change with them. So many musicians are doing better than ever before because of youtube too.
I play the baroque lute and I can tell you that it is much tougher to get a gig in a bar today than it was in 1650 in France.
The best lutenist though are killing it on youtube with Bach videos.