Live data from Hacker News

IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

theregister.com

481–490 of 504 posts

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I don't like DEI and am willing to engage. The US has a huge disparity of outcomes along racial lines. This is a legacy of slavery as well as social and governmental discrimination following slavery. [Racial biases persist today, but are much better today than the past, and we should focus on elimination of those biases, not adding new ones.] These factors result in real disparity in capabilities and merit today. Thi…

"If a school enroll someone with a 400 point lower sat over the higher person on the sole basis of their race, that is a major Injustice on the scale of individual humans, even if it moves some group statistic closer to equal." So this is a hypothetical that is not worth discussing. Until specific cases can be brought to bear, why are you inventing situations that may never have existed? I'd also like to opine on SAT…

I don't think you can fix racial inequity in 5 years, and any effort that claim to is a lie or catastrophic.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#482

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That’s fair—I’m closer to the east coast, so around me it is mostly white dudes, but that might not be true elsewhere. But it is mostly men, at any rate.

The question was if you believe the hiring process is excluding the other groups. Another way of asking that is, are similarly qualified people from the other groups applying in sufficient number? Would they have been hired if they had?

Yes, I think the hiring process has been excluding the other groups for decades.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#483

Of all the RTO orders, part of this at least makes sense. If you're in sales, it's beneficial to be close to your clients. But if you're working on cloud, hard to see how working at the office is any more productive than from home. also, this is significant: > The employee shuffling has been accompanied by rolling layoffs in the US, but hiring in India – there are at least 10x as many open IBM jobs in India as there…

It's not that complicated. If you fire all the 35-60 year olds you get sued. However, if you tell everyone ages 20-60 that they have to move, you will get a disproportionate number of people 35-60 refusing to move - and it's legal. They have kids in school, they are married, they have a house, etc. They are also making more money. Telling teams to RTO especially to move to do so is one of the simplest cost saving tricks any tech company has.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#484
post #467

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Here's the opinion of the Society for Women Engineers: > Cutting these [DEI] programs means fewer resources for students that need support. It’s devastating for women https://swe.org/magazine/dei-faces-rising-waters/ That's an admission that DEI in schools supports women, from some of its biggest advocates. Where are the programs to support boys in school? Edit: Of course, the mere existence of the Society for Women…

Women are not close to even 50% of engineering students or industry or academic engineers yet you go after society of women engineers? Let's flip it - nursing, where men are a minority: https://www.aamn.org/ Oh look, a society dedicated to men in nursing. This is completely reasonable. The idea to go from "women are most of college graduates" to "society of women engineers should not exist" is insane. > without compa…

As a man studying that field, I was surprised I'd never heard of that group. Then I saw how tiny it is. There are only four local chapters in all of California, with none on any UC campus.

https://www.aamn.org/chapter-directory

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#485

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just because you don't like people or tribe supporting a policy or their motives supporting such policies doesn't make a policy good or bad or valid or invalid. During COVID times, some statements or policies that turned out to be true were overly supported by some b wacky and or political undesirable people. Reacting to this, many decisions or policies stayed in place or were undertaken.

Is this an argument to keep DEI in place?

It's an argument to not trust a book by its cover.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#486
post #204

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it goes beyond bad management. These are my disadvantages of working remotely. I say all of these things as an advocate for hybrid work arrangements and co-working spaces/satellite offices: 1) Some people work better in an office. Offices are literally designed for working anyhow. 2) Some people didn't, and/or still don't, have optimal conditions in their house to work remotely. I've seen tons of people on ca…

> I've seen tons of people on camera (another thing some management likes to "encourage" by mandate) who are working out of bedrooms, closets, or other makeshift rooms in their house. This is just _asking_ for a constant barrage of distractions. At home, there have never been more than three other people in my house, when I’m “at work” with my door closed, they knew not to bother me. At work in an office there are co…

I think we are going to agree to disagree on some things, but I understand that I am a professional weirdo when it comes to the WFH/RTO battle. I'm a child-free late-30s guy who has always loved commuting (traffic and all) and working away from home and treats the airport, airplane cabin and hotel room in some other city as a collective happy place.

> As far as “tech sales”. I’ve lead my share of complex cloud tech projects from discovery, customer acceptance to leading the delivery - all remotely. Yes sometimes I had to travel to the client’s site. But I haven’t needed to be in the office with the people on my team (who were sometimes in another country).

I was a cloud/DevOps consultant/SA as well before I moved into tech presales. It's a different world, even though it doesn't seem like it would be on paper.

Delivery can be (and usually is, these days) done remotely, but I've found that finding new opportunities to expand or sell into new parts of business is easier when done face to face. The human part of the job is difficult to replicate over Zoom, in my experience.

That said, when I was a consultant/SA, I much preferred pairing with clients in person than over Zoom. I enjoyed the travel and found sharing a keyboard to be more engaging than talking at a screen for hours on end. I realize that this was probably a "me" thing and that others are totally fine with remote pairing.

> My coworkers are just that my coworkers. At work, “I’m taking a step back to look at things from the thousand foot few”, “taking things to the parking lot”, and “adding on to what Becky said”. I’m a completely different person at home. At the end of the day, my “friends” at work are not interested in keeping their jobs. I go to work to make money - not friends.

This is where we differ. I'm at my best when I'm working with others in-person towards a common goal. While I'm also motivated by money and am not pining to make lifelong friends in the workplace, I miss going to the bar at the end of a long week and decompressing with others who "get it." My wife has this, and I'm always jealous about it. For me, doing this over Zoom pales in comparison.

However, all of this is why I prefer hybrid arrangements that are mostly remote with budget for monthly team get-togethers. I don't think being on-site every day is effective, but I've found being perma-remote to be really isolating.

> ’ve worked for two companies remotely since 2020 - Amazon and now a much smaller company. They both had excellent onboarding procedures. While AWS wasn’t “remote first”, my department (Professional Services) was as is my current company. Both had “onboarding buddies” and Amazon had a list of people you should set up 1x1’s with an instructions for the relevant internal systems you should use.

These are excellent systems _if you are a self-starter and know what you're doing_. They fall apart if you are junior that develops best in a dedicated environment, or if you prefer a more "social" way of onboarding.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#487
post #486

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> I've seen tons of people on camera (another thing some management likes to "encourage" by mandate) who are working out of bedrooms, closets, or other makeshift rooms in their house. This is just _asking_ for a constant barrage of distractions. At home, there have never been more than three other people in my house, when I’m “at work” with my door closed, they knew not to bother me. At work in an office there are co…

I think we are going to agree to disagree on some things, but I understand that I am a professional weirdo when it comes to the WFH/RTO battle. I'm a child-free late-30s guy who has always loved commuting (traffic and all) and working away from home and treats the airport, airplane cabin and hotel room in some other city as a collective happy place. > As far as “tech sales”. I’ve lead my share of complex cloud tech p…

I’m not denying the importance of sales meeting clients face to face or even leading the delivery side with a few face to face meetings during both discovery and turn over. I am one of the psychopaths that loves business travel and meeting clients in person.

I’m saying that it is silly to have those roles be in the corporate office of your employer.

AWS ProServe has a 3 month training program for their early career hires and career transitioners. It was all remote.

Even for their more senior roles, they had “AWSome Builder” where you had a two month “project” simulating a real world engagement where you had a mentor and five people from the department acting like stakeholders - CTOs, CFOs, directors etc. This was also remote where you had to do presentations.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#488

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That seems rather unlikely, you have any data to back that up? Someone else linked this article https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/new-chart-illustrates-graphic... > For the 2015-2016 academic year, the average GPA of all students applying to medical schools was 3.55 and the average MCAT score was 28.3 according to data from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC). > The middle set of bars in the top chart ab…

That link shows that (presumably in order to meet diversity targets) black applicants with a GPA of 3.2-3.39 had nearly the same acceptance rate as Asian applicants with a 3.6-3.79 GPA. 0.4 points is an entire standard deviation for GPA.

Ok? So what? The goal of this process isn't to find the "best" people to admit, it's select between a group of people who are already qualified.

Someone else getting picked instead of you sucks regardless of the reason and there's always going to be an imperfect system doing the picking.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#489

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The question was if you believe the hiring process is excluding the other groups. Another way of asking that is, are similarly qualified people from the other groups applying in sufficient number? Would they have been hired if they had?

Yes, I think the hiring process has been excluding the other groups for decades.

Why?

Earlier you stated that you don't see them represented in the workforce but that doesn't necessarily imply exclusion by the party doing the hiring. Given what the labor market for dev is like I feel that attributing observations to blatant discrimination should require extensive direct evidence.

Re: IBM orders US sales to locate near customers, RTO for cloud staff, DEI purge

#490
post #454

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>By one juror or two, and if the defense lawyers are dummies and fail to do their job. Corporations like IBM have lawyers on retainer and they are not that incompetent. What do you mean by one juror or two? My point is regarding when juries are legally allowed to make an intent determination. It often does not require a specific expression of intent and instead can be inferred from activities that indicate things lik…

> What do you mean by one juror or two? My point is regarding when juries are legally allowed to make an intent determination. It often does not require a specific expression of intent and instead can be inferred from activities that indicate things like reckless behavior and disregard for the potential that they do the unlawful thing. The point is the defense can show loads of documents about how working together in…

>The point is the defense can show loads of documents about how working together increases efficiency, how they are streamlining units and they plaintiff has to prove they were targeted as an ex-DEI hire and even though there is just hunch. I don’t know about other countries but that’s how it works in US.

They can and a jury can still think that was not the actual reason someone was fired.

>Worker protection here is very weak. There are protected categories but they’d have the burden of proof they were let go specifically because of their protected category.

You're just making things up.

>Exactly, moreover jurors would be instructed to make up their mind based on the presented evidence. One side will have papers and the other will have read-between-lines hunches. Sure jurors can still do whatever but unless they’re all activist jurors they will just go with whatever side is more convincing and the evidence they have been presented.

You're mistaking plausibility with convincingness.

Post reply on HN