Live data from Hacker News

Canada Border Services seizes lawyer's phone, laptop for not sharing passwords

cbc.ca

481–483 of 483 posts

Re: Canada Border Services seizes lawyer's phone, laptop for not sharing passwords

#481

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>Power trip? It saddens me that we think of federal governments as benign protectors of our rights. The States did not need and did not want a federal government. We feared they couldn't protect our interests. We had to be persuaded through the Bill of Rights to accept their "protection." The feds have some idealistic people within their organizations, but their stance is to utilize state-level resources for their ow…

You've got some interesting points here, but it definitely reads more like conspiratorial thinking. What realistic difference is there between "The States" and the federal government? In the end you're still going to have a government enforcing these things, unless you depart radically from our current societal structure. It sounds like you're just skeptical of a powerful centralized state, and it's coming out throug…

> What realistic difference is there between "The States" and the federal government?

It's huge! The power to drive international trade and warfare, for starters! Also, the ability to create laws that don't reflect people in your area/community.

Also wrt this thread, states don't (generally) enforce searches at their borders, because states aren't fighting for domination with nation-states. States are only trying to control their geographic area.

Thank you for the references, I'll check them out.

Re: Canada Border Services seizes lawyer's phone, laptop for not sharing passwords

#482

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Unless you are under an active investigation, the chances of your mailed laptop or phone being intercepted and searched are far, far less than if they are on your person at the border. Still, if you are paranoid enough you can mitigate the danger of your data falling into unsecured hands (at the border or by mail intercept) by using an encrypted shadow volume: https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/Hidden%20Volume.html

> the chances of your mailed laptop or phone being intercepted and searched are far, far less than if they are on your person at the border Isn't "mailing a laptop" now counted as sending dangerous goods, due to the battery?[0] If so, the chances of it being subject to interception and/or search might well be far higher than someone just carrying a laptop in hand luggage across an international border. [0] https://ww…

How do you think the manufacturer ships them, one by one, to the purchasers?

Re: Canada Border Services seizes lawyer's phone, laptop for not sharing passwords

#483

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> the chances of your mailed laptop or phone being intercepted and searched are far, far less than if they are on your person at the border Isn't "mailing a laptop" now counted as sending dangerous goods, due to the battery?[0] If so, the chances of it being subject to interception and/or search might well be far higher than someone just carrying a laptop in hand luggage across an international border. [0] https://ww…

How do you think the manufacturer ships them, one by one, to the purchasers?

I've just had a look on my favourite parcel shipping site and found this wording in their terms:

> RESTRICTED ITEMS The following items are deemed unsuitable for shipment by our services, and are therefore restricted. Any of these items being sent may result in surcharges, delays or confiscation by authorities where appropriate. No damage cover is available with these items:

> [a long list of stuff, including laptops]

So, who here would be happy to ship their laptop internationally without damage cover?

Post reply on HN