Earlier quoted context omitted.
Check out "Darker Reader" extension... now you'll get that everywhere, automatically, with good looking dark colors. I think it achieves that by leveraging color theory and CSS filters. Once you try it you cannot go back :) I am not involved in development nor devs are friends of mine, I just think it didn't get all the exposure it deserves. PS if you're on chrome, after installing Darker Reader the infamous chrome w…
as much as I love that extension, I prefer "native" dark modes (as in, provided directly by the website)
DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
481–490 of 496 posts
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#482Earlier quoted context omitted.
How so? Apple shared all their iCloud user data (messages, pics, docs, etc.) and keys with the Chinese government last year. [1] Apple even updated their TOS forcing Chinese users to agree to it or drop service. [2] Google got flak for just considering it with Dragonfly, but Apple actually did it . [1] https://mashable.com/article/china-government-apple-icloud-d... [2] https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-apple-i…
This is constantly being misreported. No. They. Do. Not. Apple's data is kept on the device and so are the keys. If you enable that data to be put on the cloud (it's an opt-in) then they will also store the key, but otherwise they do not.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#483Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Sure duckduckgo is a good company right now, but that's only because they're small. Only because they are small? That seems to imply that if they ever get big, they’ll no doubt become evil, privacy-wise. Apple proves that does not have to be the case.
Apple’s main business is hardware, and software that helps sell the hardware. Any revenue from data is likely a seperate, minor stream; and for it to become a significant one, likely requires significant changes in Apple’s operations. Like any other hardware company, they don’t need google’s kind of data collection to make money. But DDG is primarily funded by search, and the search business is funded by ads, which a…
Then again, they do stupid things like eliminating the basic hardware features that people use to consume those services, like the headphone jacks people would have used to listen to Apple Music.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#484Earlier quoted context omitted.
DDG's main marketing model is talking about how they believe Google is privacy threat, so they'll highlight that angle in any change.
Google _is_ a privacy threat. Completely unrelated to DDG, marketing or believe. One Google with thousand tentacles...
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#485Earlier quoted context omitted.
You are using one instance - sharing Chinese users' data with the Chinese government - as the sole metric for judging a company's privacy policies. That's just as dishonest as the GP paraphrasing the link they cited to make it appear Apple did something they did not. I'm not defending Apple WRT their data privacy practices in China; as I said it's terrifying and hopefully not a stepping stone. I was simply calling GP…
Sharing millions of users' personal data with a surveillance state notorious for civil rights violations is not a trivial matter, especially in any discussion involving privacy reputation. If you think there are privacy issues that are more important than that then list them.
And now that you've brought this discussion into ad hominem territory, it has lost any relevance to the actual topic at hand. Peace.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#486Earlier quoted context omitted.
What part of handing over keys to iCloud to Chinese govt need to be applauded? The sooner people realize big corportations including Apple, Google will do things to generate profit, the better. Wallstreet, for better or worse, wont be kind if Tim Cook came in and said we decided to forego profit because differential privacy
Apple obeys the laws of the countries is operates in. Are you suggesting they should not? On your second point, they Tim Cook has already said on their earnings calls that they could have monetized user data if they wanted to and chose not to. In fact they built Apple Maps at huge cost specifically so they would not have to give personal data to Google. They've been very clear about this.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#487Some paint it as if the main reason to switch was privacy ( https://www.imore.com/duckduckgo-switches-apple-maps-because... "DuckDuckGo switches to Apple Maps, because privacy"), but the previous map provider was mapbox (openstreetmap plus commercial sources) and I doubt mapbox collected more data than Apple is now.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#488Earlier quoted context omitted.
DDG’s “product” is a privacy centric search. Once they get big why would they throw their product away and become like the competition? That simply does not make any sense because the only reason why most people use them is the privacy aspect. Good on Apple and DDG for realising that privacy has value and using that to grow their product.
Well, the obvious reason is that it may not be possible to get “big” as a search engine, without chipping away at the privacy gaurantees. Even if they get the users, can they sufficiently monetize them without turning into google?
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#489Earlier quoted context omitted.
>I wish they were explaining why they moved away from Mapbox and OSM in general! Because it sucks. Isn’t that obvious? There’s no point in having a feature that nobody uses. I switched to DDG a few months ago and this has always been the one weakness. This is really good news IMO. Apple maps has come a long long way since launch, and their data is about on par with Google at this point. You can argue all day that of…
> Apple maps has come a long long way since launch, and their data is about on par with Google at this point. In California maybe. Everywhere else? Not even close.
Re: DuckDuckGo will use Apple Maps
#490Earlier quoted context omitted.
> The premium market will pay to not deal with this nonsense. And thus stand out for targeting purposes regardless.
Targeting works the more data you have. You could target “well off iOS user” but that’s less invasive than “searched topics of adoption and abortion. Recommend local abortion clinics”. Ya see what I’m getting at here?