Earlier quoted context omitted.
They need the website to add their code in order to track you. The website could just send the IPs as easily.
Just an IP is presumably not enough to fingerprint someone.
Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
481–487 of 487 posts
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#482Earlier quoted context omitted.
>no one with a "D" after their name asking Zuckerberg a question today I can't even see where the goalposts have gone.
> Ted Cruz clearly showing that he's a partisan hack. Didn't give a crap about users' privacy or the issues at hand, he had to make it about 'liberal Silicon Valley' and 'conservative persecution'. What a joke. Couple of different "goal posts" here
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#483Earlier quoted context omitted.
Well, you could also encrypt the data with a per-user key and throw that away when you delete the user. No the data was not deleted, but access to it is. There are ways to design data retention around deletable constraints like this. The bigger question is more like “do we trust facebook to agree with us on what deleting an account acually means?” For isntance, i’m curious if you delete your account whether they stil…
But what does it mean to "throw [the key] away"? Are you operating at scale? I hope you have a very robust backup system (including enough that you can even recover from something like the Sony hack), and so you're going to need to ensure that you delete it from those systems. And then, you're dealing with 100s (1000s? 10000s?) of these deletions a day. Do you want that to be instant? Are you really that confident in…
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#484Just feel lucky you still have a hearing.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#485Earlier quoted context omitted.
Far left very much engages in hate speech. Kill all white people etc etc. You can try to true scotsman that, but you can do the same for the far right.
So in the US right is white people and left is everyone else?
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#486Some poor Senator just went on a rabbit hunt to discuss FB's bug bounty program. Who are these Congressional staffers? Tech illiteracy is on full-display; we're not even talking 'power-users' (who were on UseNet, btw), these people are lost. Zuckerberg had to be gracious and say his team would follow-up on many things that it was clear the Senator didn't even understand. This is supposed to be our smart chamber.
The Senate is not supposed to be the "smart chamber" but the chamber that lessens the House's power to vote for the vagaries of the moment. This is also why the Senate but not the House confirms appointments and approves treaties.
Re: Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress
#487Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Ted Cruz clearly showing that he's a partisan hack. Didn't give a crap about users' privacy or the issues at hand, he had to make it about 'liberal Silicon Valley' and 'conservative persecution'. What a joke. Couple of different "goal posts" here
Fair enough, although I'm entitled to interpret posts in the pure context of their parent.